PF9 vs LC9

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

DocV
Senior Member
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: PF9 vs LC9

Post by DocV »

A-R's mentioning the PPS is timely as I have been thinking about buying one of those. I have not found one in any of the LGS but maybe I just need to drive down to Austin or up to Dallas. A-R what do you think of the Quicksafe™ Safety and the optional backstraps? Some grips just never feel right in my paws so being able to adjust backstraps is intriguing. The LC9 is quite comfortable for me too.
User avatar
Kahrry
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Texas

Re: PF9 vs LC9

Post by Kahrry »

I personally carry the Kahr CW9 for my EDC and my wife has been looking for a slim gun to carry on her body. She likes the Kahr ok but really likes the feel of the Ruger. She says the Kel Tec "isn't pretty enough" :headscratch I'd like to talk her our of the LC9 because I don't think she'll handle the long trigger pull that well. The Taurus 709 slim is actually closer to her XD40sc as far as the trigger goes and she'll probably decrease her learning curve with it.

Also, we have recently fondled the Beretta Nano and the only flaw I see with it (prior to actually shooting it) is the 6+1 capacity.
Kahr CW9
Springfield XD40 sub-compact
User avatar
terryg
Senior Member
Posts: 1719
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: Alvin, TX

Re: PF9 vs LC9

Post by terryg »

I think the PPS is just enough larger than the rest to be out of the category. I think it would be a "very-small 9mm" rather than a "ultra-small 9mm". IMHO ...
... this space intentionally left blank ...
User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: PF9 vs LC9

Post by A-R »

terryg wrote:I think the PPS is just enough larger than the rest to be out of the category. I think it would be a "very-small 9mm" rather than a "ultra-small 9mm". IMHO ...
A good point. Other two are just slightly more pOcketable, if that's your intent (though neither is in same category as Kahr PM/CM). But for belt carry, other than slight weight difference I doubt you'd notice much difference between PPS and LC9/709
User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: PF9 vs LC9

Post by A-R »

DocV wrote:A-R's mentioning the PPS is timely as I have been thinking about buying one of those. I have not found one in any of the LGS but maybe I just need to drive down to Austin or up to Dallas. A-R what do you think of the Quicksafe™ Safety and the optional backstraps? Some grips just never feel right in my paws so being able to adjust backstraps is intriguing. The LC9 is quite comfortable for me too.
I use large blackstrap after trying both. On double stack guns I use no blackstrap (smallest setting) on Gen 4 Glock, medium on S&W M&P9, and small on S&W M&P45

Is quick safe the blackstrap disconnect safety? I don't like that as an idea (one more "feature" to break at worst possible moment), but have not had an actual problem with it.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”