Page 2 of 2
Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:16 pm
by RPB
Katygunnut wrote:Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Good, good.
This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.
Wow, there doesn't appear to be any safety, and it looks like it also takes an extremely low amount of pressure to make that thing cut. I can't believe we allow something like that on the market.
and it came with no instructions on which end to grab? No user manual?
Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:37 pm
by Katygunnut
RPB wrote:Katygunnut wrote:Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Good, good.
This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.
Wow, there doesn't appear to be any safety, and it looks like it also takes an extremely low amount of pressure to make that thing cut. I can't believe we allow something like that on the market.
and it came with no instructions on which end to grab? No user manual?
We need new legislation NOW!
Think about the children!!!!!
Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:10 pm
by jocat54
Here we go again, sue,sue,sue, lawyers and Judges (sorry Charles...not you) have got to start throwing this garbage out.
Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:19 pm
by tommyg
Looks like the LEO was criminally neglant since he left his gun where a child could get it.
Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:33 pm
by rm9792
jocat54 wrote:Here we go again, sue,sue,sue, lawyers and Judges (sorry Charles...not you) have got to start throwing this garbage out.
Why would they? This is their bread and butter. You ever hear of the public winning a class action?