Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:06 pm
This just occurred to me...
Do you suppose that this is a round-about method for getting access to 30.06 wording? That is, if this passes, it will require a change in wording for 30.06, and that puts 30.06 on the table without them having to face it directly...
Do you suppose that this is a round-about method for getting access to 30.06 wording? That is, if this passes, it will require a change in wording for 30.06, and that puts 30.06 on the table without them having to face it directly...