Re: Gun ban contingency plans
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:59 pm
I would have agreed with you yesterday. After seeing what McConnell did on the fiscal cliff, I don't know.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
I agree. I don't see the votes for anything of consequence. They've been peddling this same weapons and magazine ban since 2004 and it has never come to fruition. People make stupid irrational decisions based on emotion. I think we all know you don't make rash decisions based on emotion. Rahm said never waste a good crisis, but all I see are two siblings fighting over who did the most cleaning on their room, yet it still looks like a disaster. The next two years are going nowhere.Weg wrote:Maybe I am a pollyanna, but I just don't think it's gonna happen, new AWB ban on the federal level. In fact, I don't even think Reid would let it through the Senate, even if he does, I can't see the House passing any kind of AWB ban. We'll see if i'm right, but i'm making no contingency plans, but then again, i have all the AR's I want. On a side note, when I lived in Cali., I remember someone making a .556 pump that took AR mags, not sure who it was, but sounded like a decent non-semiauto option at the time.
If that happens, and the American people just take it... that won't be the beggining of the end but, it will sure be the end of the beginning...mr surveyor wrote:executive orders
Ruger Gunsite Scout, .308 Winchester, 10 round removable box magazine, 1.5-5x33mm Leupold Scout Scope. Not the same caliber, but a handy bolt rifle in a battle rifle caliber.Chris wrote:I own a few WWII era Enfields. For bolt action rifles with ten round magazines, they can sustain a very fast rate of accurate fire. And not a lot of people are taking 303 British off the shelves.
TAM, that's an interesting alternative I hadn't considered. Wonder which action I could learn to work faster - bolt or lever?The Annoyed Man wrote:Ruger Gunsite Scout, .308 Winchester, 10 round removable box magazine, 1.5-5x33mm Leupold Scout Scope. Not the same caliber, but a handy bolt rifle in a battle rifle caliber.Chris wrote:I own a few WWII era Enfields. For bolt action rifles with ten round magazines, they can sustain a very fast rate of accurate fire. And not a lot of people are taking 303 British off the shelves.
My understanding (please correct if I have any of this wrong) is the "grandfathering" as proposed in the synopsis on Feinstein's website includes mandated registration of each banned weapon and magazine under NFA guidelines (same as rules to own a full-auto weapon, short-barrel firearm, suppressor etc), plus assumably paying the $200 NFA tax stamp per item? ... and I'm not sure I would be willing (nor financially capable) to go down that road if God forbid it passes in that form.Scott in Houston wrote:I'm confused...
if you own an AR already, why are you going down this route? My AR will be my home defense weapon regardless. If there is any type of ban, there would almost (nearly 100% likely) be a grandfather type clause. There's just no way it would pass without it. My AR and other guns and rifles will serve the same purpose they do today.
I do have a Marlin 30-30 that would be a nice alternative if I didn't own the AR, but that's a non-issue IMO.
That very well may be what's proposed. I'd say there's about a 0.0001% chance of it passing in that form.A-R wrote:My understanding (please correct if I have any of this wrong) is the "grandfathering" as proposed in the synopsis on Feinstein's website includes mandated registration of each banned weapon and magazine under NFA guidelines (same as rules to own a full-auto weapon, short-barrel firearm, suppressor etc), plus assumably paying the $200 NFA tax stamp per item? ... and I'm not sure I would be willing (nor financially capable) to go down that road if God forbid it passes in that form.Scott in Houston wrote:I'm confused...
if you own an AR already, why are you going down this route? My AR will be my home defense weapon regardless. If there is any type of ban, there would almost (nearly 100% likely) be a grandfather type clause. There's just no way it would pass without it. My AR and other guns and rifles will serve the same purpose they do today.
I do have a Marlin 30-30 that would be a nice alternative if I didn't own the AR, but that's a non-issue IMO.
So my thought exercise here is to determine what alternative weapons are available to avoid that possibility.
I'm surprised you left out the Henry Big Boy.A-R wrote:Reading elsewhere, seems pistol-caliber lever-action rifles are as easy to find as AR-15 items (Marlin stopped production a few years ago, so only Rossi currently produces lever rifles in .357, .44 etc.)
I left it out for same reason as the Winchester pistol-caliber levers ... PRICEY - but also they're about 1.5 pounds heavier than Marlin, Mossberg, Rossi lever riflesbaldeagle wrote:I'm surprised you left out the Henry Big Boy.A-R wrote:Reading elsewhere, seems pistol-caliber lever-action rifles are as easy to find as AR-15 items (Marlin stopped production a few years ago, so only Rossi currently produces lever rifles in .357, .44 etc.)
A-R wrote:I left it out for same reason as the Winchester pistol-caliber levers ... PRICEY - but also they're about 1.5 pounds heavier than Marlin, Mossberg, Rossi lever riflesbaldeagle wrote:I'm surprised you left out the Henry Big Boy.A-R wrote:Reading elsewhere, seems pistol-caliber lever-action rifles are as easy to find as AR-15 items (Marlin stopped production a few years ago, so only Rossi currently produces lever rifles in .357, .44 etc.)