Go Wyoming.!

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

brainman
Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:15 am

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by brainman »

RoyGbiv, that it some interesting reading you've pointed to.
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.
RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by RottenApple »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.
If I had the money, expertise, and my wife wouldn't divorce me, I might. "rlol"
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by APynckel »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by C-dub »

RoyGBiv wrote: 9 States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm
10 accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured
I also says "owned" in line 10.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
OldCurlyWolf
Senior Member
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:00 am

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by OldCurlyWolf »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.
Good Question.

Under the right conditions, I could be persuaded, but I don't think those conditions are likely to come about.

I love a good fight. :coolgleamA:
I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on.
I don't do those things to other people and I require the same of them.

Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he’ll just kill you.
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by APynckel »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by C-dub »

APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!
Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by APynckel »

C-dub wrote: Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
It does based on 80+ years of "doctrine"...

Remember, marijuana causes people to rape! (research it)

It is still a federal class 1 narcotic, and they're overlooking it. Now the federal gov't wants to ban items that are GUARANTEED by our Constitution, and our state leaders are hesitant to protect our rights.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by C-dub »

APynckel wrote:
C-dub wrote: Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
It does based on 80+ years of "doctrine"...

Remember, marijuana causes people to rape! (research it)

It is still a federal class 1 narcotic, and they're overlooking it. Now the federal gov't wants to ban items that are GUARANTEED by our Constitution, and our state leaders are hesitant to protect our rights.
I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!

I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by APynckel »

C-dub wrote: I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!

I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
Now you are subject to my libertarianism (IT WAS A TRAP!!). Why should the federal government regulate what you choose to put in your body? Why should the federal government regulate what you can own or possess?

Welcome to the higher plane of thought.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by C-dub »

APynckel wrote:
C-dub wrote: I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!

I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
Now you are subject to my libertarianism (IT WAS A TRAP!!). Why should the federal government regulate what you choose to put in your body? Why should the federal government regulate what you can own or possess?

Welcome to the higher plane of thought.
That's been happening more and more to me lately. ;-)
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by APynckel »

C-dub wrote:That's been happening more and more to me lately. ;-)
which part?
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
bigbang
Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:08 pm

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Post by bigbang »

C-dub wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!
Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
:iagree: They probably voted for the current federal authorities.
This is a Glock 40. Fifty Cent. Too Short. All of them talk about a Glock 40. OK?
I'm the only one in this forum fool enough - that I know of - to shoot himself with a Glock 40.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”