The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
If I had the money, expertise, and my wife wouldn't divorce me, I might.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
I also says "owned" in line 10.RoyGBiv wrote: 9 States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm
10 accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured
Good Question.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.APynckel wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
... if the states stand together.....
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!Charles L. Cotton wrote:It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.APynckel wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
... if the states stand together.....
Chas.
Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.APynckel wrote:The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!Charles L. Cotton wrote:It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.APynckel wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
... if the states stand together.....
Chas.
It does based on 80+ years of "doctrine"...C-dub wrote: Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!APynckel wrote:It does based on 80+ years of "doctrine"...C-dub wrote: Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
Remember, marijuana causes people to rape! (research it)
It is still a federal class 1 narcotic, and they're overlooking it. Now the federal gov't wants to ban items that are GUARANTEED by our Constitution, and our state leaders are hesitant to protect our rights.
Now you are subject to my libertarianism (IT WAS A TRAP!!). Why should the federal government regulate what you choose to put in your body? Why should the federal government regulate what you can own or possess?C-dub wrote: I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!
I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
That's been happening more and more to me lately.APynckel wrote:Now you are subject to my libertarianism (IT WAS A TRAP!!). Why should the federal government regulate what you choose to put in your body? Why should the federal government regulate what you can own or possess?C-dub wrote: I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!
I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
Welcome to the higher plane of thought.
which part?C-dub wrote:That's been happening more and more to me lately.
C-dub wrote:Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.APynckel wrote:The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!Charles L. Cotton wrote:It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.APynckel wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?
Chas.
... if the states stand together.....
Chas.
They probably voted for the current federal authorities.