Page 2 of 4

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:19 pm
by brainman
RoyGbiv, that it some interesting reading you've pointed to.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:08 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:09 pm
by RottenApple
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.
If I had the money, expertise, and my wife wouldn't divorce me, I might. "rlol"

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:41 pm
by APynckel
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:55 pm
by C-dub
RoyGBiv wrote: 9 States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm
10 accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured
I also says "owned" in line 10.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:05 pm
by OldCurlyWolf
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.
Good Question.

Under the right conditions, I could be persuaded, but I don't think those conditions are likely to come about.

I love a good fight. :coolgleamA:

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:09 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:25 pm
by APynckel
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:28 pm
by C-dub
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!
Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:32 pm
by APynckel
C-dub wrote: Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
It does based on 80+ years of "doctrine"...

Remember, marijuana causes people to rape! (research it)

It is still a federal class 1 narcotic, and they're overlooking it. Now the federal gov't wants to ban items that are GUARANTEED by our Constitution, and our state leaders are hesitant to protect our rights.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:39 pm
by C-dub
APynckel wrote:
C-dub wrote: Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
It does based on 80+ years of "doctrine"...

Remember, marijuana causes people to rape! (research it)

It is still a federal class 1 narcotic, and they're overlooking it. Now the federal gov't wants to ban items that are GUARANTEED by our Constitution, and our state leaders are hesitant to protect our rights.
I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!

I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:43 pm
by APynckel
C-dub wrote: I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!

I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
Now you are subject to my libertarianism (IT WAS A TRAP!!). Why should the federal government regulate what you choose to put in your body? Why should the federal government regulate what you can own or possess?

Welcome to the higher plane of thought.

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:45 pm
by C-dub
APynckel wrote:
C-dub wrote: I absolutely agree and think it should be illegal. I have only smoked one thing in my life and that was a brisket in my Big Green Egg. Boy did I inhale!

I was only thinking that a bunch of potheads doesn't threaten the feds' power or authority. But, they are afraid of an armed citizenry. As they should be. That's why it's there.
Now you are subject to my libertarianism (IT WAS A TRAP!!). Why should the federal government regulate what you choose to put in your body? Why should the federal government regulate what you can own or possess?

Welcome to the higher plane of thought.
That's been happening more and more to me lately. ;-)

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:47 pm
by APynckel
C-dub wrote:That's been happening more and more to me lately. ;-)
which part?

Re: Go Wyoming.!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:54 pm
by bigbang
C-dub wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who is willing to move to Wyoming, open a firearms manufacturing business without the appropriate FFL, then test Wyoming's new law?

Chas.

... if the states stand together.....
It's not about individual states; it's about the poor sucker who lives in Wyoming and believes the law means he can manufacture firearms without the appropriate FFL. He's the one who'll be convicted and going to prison as a convicted felon.

Chas.
The federal government cannot ignore 20, 30, 40 states that sign nullification laws! They just ignored 2 states that have undermined DEA class 1 narcotic laws!
Yeah, but people smoking dope and getting high doesn't threaten their authority.
:iagree: They probably voted for the current federal authorities.