CNN Gun Control Poll

canvasbck · Post by **canvasbck** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:10 pm

74% of respondents support some or all of president's gun violence plan

That's the headline they get out of this "poll"

RPB · Post by **RPB** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:21 pm

canvasbck wrote:74% of respondents support some or all of president's gun violence plan

That's the headline they get out of this "poll"

That's what Colin Goddard will be telling Congress during hearings ...
Senators/Representatives the elected officials will hear ....32,850 VOTERS

All
53%
17412
None
24%
7854
Some
23%
7584
Total votes: 32850

mojo84 · Post by **mojo84** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:04 pm

Just something else to add to Mr. Cotton's list when he gets it up and running. viewtopic.php?f=94&t=61776

ajwakeboarder · Post by **ajwakeboarder** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:07 pm

I don't trust poll you don't have to register for. You can go vote in the poll, clear you internet history, refresh the page and vote again. The poll doesn't track voters, it tracks how many times the little button is clicked. I bet CNN has some interns in there doing that over and over again clicking all.

Middle Age Russ · Post by **Middle Age Russ** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:48 pm

Voted (once) in the poll, such as it is. The overall percentages may or may not be a correct representation of those who have voted. There are a LOT of uninformed, emotion-driven folks out there. Thus the emphasis on quickly pushing for these measures before cooler heads prevail. The dog and pony show is already begun with the intent of keeping the emotions high and shouting down sane debate and measures.

tuna · Post by **tuna** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:28 pm

I voted "all"...

There are 20 dead kids. That's just plain wrong.

Anything less than a real attempt to get at the root of this problem is wasting time.

I'm not some nutter that thinks Obama's gonna take our guns away, but there has to be a way to restrict ownership to potential ticking bombs.

And this might not be the popular opinion, but the NRA has zero credibility here.

Mike1951 · Post by **Mike1951** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:44 pm

tuna wrote:I voted "all"...

There are 20 dead kids. That's just plain wrong.

Anything less than a real attempt to get at the root of this problem is wasting time.

I'm not some nutter that thinks Obama's gonna take our guns away, but there has to be a way to restrict ownership to potential ticking bombs.

And this might not be the popular opinion, but the NRA has zero credibility here.

And you need to understand that with first posts like this, YOU have zero credibility here!

fickman · Post by **fickman** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:46 pm

Hahahaha

*popping popcorn*

Topbuilder · Post by **Topbuilder** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:50 pm

Somethin' just don't smell right about that post (er).

RPB · Post by **RPB** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:51 pm

tuna wrote:I voted "all"...

There are 20 dead kids. That's just plain wrong.

Anything less than a real attempt to get at the root of this problem is wasting time.

I'm not some nutter that thinks Obama's gonna take our guns away, but there has to be a way to restrict ownership to potential ticking bombs.

And this might not be the popular opinion, but the NRA has zero credibility here.

I enjoy a good joke

pass the popcorn I tried to teach them up yonder how Taiwan and Israel protects kids at school, and I'm armed up to the door taking my kids and my niece all these years, but don't blame an object for PEOPLE'S failure to protect their kids WHILE at school .... It's Bush's fault, it's somebody else's fault I don't like personal responsibility ... blame the ummmm sunspots ...

longhorn_92 · Post by **longhorn_92** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:55 pm

tuna wrote:I voted "all"...

There are 20 dead kids. That's just plain wrong.

Anything less than a real attempt to get at the root of this problem is wasting time.

I'm not some nutter that thinks Obama's gonna take our guns away, but there has to be a way to restrict ownership to potential ticking bombs.

And this might not be the popular opinion, but the NRA has zero credibility here.

It don't smell like Tuna... more like SPAM.

tuna · Post by **tuna** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:57 pm

Mike1951 wrote:And you need to understand that with first posts like this, YOU have zero credibility here!

Why is that? You're saying the dead kids don't matter?

Topbuilder · Post by **Topbuilder** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:01 pm

RPB wrote:
tuna wrote:I voted "all"...

There are 20 dead kids. That's just plain wrong.

Anything less than a real attempt to get at the root of this problem is wasting time.

I'm not some nutter that thinks Obama's gonna take our guns away, but there has to be a way to restrict ownership to potential ticking bombs.

And this might not be the popular opinion, but the NRA has zero credibility here.
I enjoy a good joke

pass the popcorn I tried to teach them up yonder how Taiwan and Israel protects kids at school, and I'm armed up to the door taking my kids and my niece all these years, but don't blame an object for PEOPLE'S failure to protect their kids WHILE at school .... It's Bush's fault, it's somebody else's fault I don't like personal responsibility ... blame the ummmm sunspots ...

I always thought the NRA should have gone to the press conference and stated " I'm not really sure why you asked me here. You have a mental heath issue. This is not one of my areas of expertise." and walked away from the podium...

tuna · Post by **tuna** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:02 pm

RPB wrote: I enjoy a good joke

pass the popcorn I tried to teach them up yonder how Taiwan and Israel protects kids at school, and I'm armed up to the door taking my kids and my niece all these years, but don't blame an object for PEOPLE'S failure to protect their kids WHILE at school .... It's Bush's fault, it's somebody else's fault I don't like personal responsibility ... blame the ummmm sunspots ...

I don't get what you're saying. What's Bush got to do with it, 'cept the coincidence that he was born in Connecticut?

I don't know if "blame" can even be laid. It's really a failure of the whole system. The shooter went crazy, and only the mom would have known. I do fault her for having accessible weapons if she knew the kid was off, but in all likelihood, she probably never thought he'd lose it like that.

RPB · Post by **RPB** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:05 pm

tuna wrote:
RPB wrote: I enjoy a good joke

pass the popcorn I tried to teach them up yonder how Taiwan and Israel protects kids at school, and I'm armed up to the door taking my kids and my niece all these years, but don't blame an object for PEOPLE'S failure to protect their kids WHILE at school .... It's Bush's fault, it's somebody else's fault I don't like personal responsibility ... blame the ummmm sunspots ...
I don't get what you're saying. What's Bush got to do with it, 'cept the coincidence that he was born in Connecticut?

I don't know if "blame" can even be laid. It's really a failure of the whole system. The shooter went crazy, and only the mom would have known. I do fault her for having accessible weapons if she knew the kid was off, but in all likelihood, she probably never thought he'd lose it like that.

But yeah, drugging all the kids has something to do with it, as does society ... and ..... a gunfree defenseless victim zone. One mane's GunFree Zone is another s shooting range.

TexasCHLforum.com

CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll

Re: CNN Gun Control Poll