Page 2 of 2
Re: Senate Judiciary Chair rejects awb.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:16 am
by 67SS
bagman45 wrote:WE MUST GIVE NOTHING!!! Unless, of course, you are willing to give up a bit more of your RIGHT to freedom and liberty.
The gun grabbers are trying to get us to negotiate against ourselves, as they have NOTHING TO NEGOTIATE WITH. We have the 2nd Amendment. It's NOT a negotiable thing. It's not a law. It's not a privilege. IT'S A RIGHT. There are no "parts" to it. There are no "except this" to it. We've already allowed them to regulate many weapons that our forefathers meant us to have access to (check it out; they had CANNONS to fight the British). WE MUST GIVE NO MORE!
Keep your passion. Continue to contact your representatives and all members of government and law enforcement DAILY. Contact the advertisers supporting the media that is working against us. Let them know that you will no longer require their products. THAT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!! This may well be the last fight we have for our liberty. Hope it's not; but act as if it is!!

and you are so correct.... many of these democrats have black guns...(what ever you will)... one thing I have come to realize is gun ownership transcends politics/party lines....
they know this time around if any of them support a ban of any type they are committing political suicide.. except for those so in trenched in left wing areas case in point(Feinstein)... what I find deplorable is Feinstein being of Jewish heritage would endorse such a Nazi style disarmament unless she is of the same mind set as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.. in that the Holocaust never happened...
Re: Senate Judiciary Chair rejects awb.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:21 am
by Redneck_Buddha
67SS wrote:bagman45 wrote:WE MUST GIVE NOTHING!!! Unless, of course, you are willing to give up a bit more of your RIGHT to freedom and liberty.
The gun grabbers are trying to get us to negotiate against ourselves, as they have NOTHING TO NEGOTIATE WITH. We have the 2nd Amendment. It's NOT a negotiable thing. It's not a law. It's not a privilege. IT'S A RIGHT. There are no "parts" to it. There are no "except this" to it. We've already allowed them to regulate many weapons that our forefathers meant us to have access to (check it out; they had CANNONS to fight the British). WE MUST GIVE NO MORE!
Keep your passion. Continue to contact your representatives and all members of government and law enforcement DAILY. Contact the advertisers supporting the media that is working against us. Let them know that you will no longer require their products. THAT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!! This may well be the last fight we have for our liberty. Hope it's not; but act as if it is!!

and you are so correct.... many of these democrats have black guns...(what ever you will)... one thing I have come to realize is gun ownership transcends politics/party lines....
they know this time around if any of them support a ban of any type they are committing political suicide.. except for those so in trenched in left wing areas case in point(Feinstein)... what I find deplorable is Feinstein being of Jewish heritage would endorse such a Nazi style disarmament unless she is of the same mind set as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.. in that the Holocaust never happened...
Being of that particular faith (by identity at least), I am overwhelmed with anger by the antics of the Jewish left. If any segment of individuals should be opposed to gun control (of ANY kind), it's the Jewish people.
JPFO forever -- "For every Jew a .22"
And by the way, I do not agree with the methods of Reb Meir Kahane, but I would like to see fellow members of the tribe adopt more of a warrior mentality to self-preservation and survival. To think it can never happen again is dangerously naive.
Re: Senate Judiciary Chair rejects awb.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:39 pm
by DEB
I was reading KOS where an individual posted that all guns needed to be banned, I know surprised right? But anyhow, the way this individual postulated for this to occur was by making a path to registration, by making it easy for gunowners to comply, by then moving to where the BATF would be allowed to come to your home and insure that the guns did move as intended, by using the media and others to further demonize guns, showing off good gunowners versus those who refuse to comply, and slowly turning the screws until final total ban. I paraphrased quite a bit, but that was the gist of it. Then I read this and it was like everything was falling into the progressive/communist model. I state "no more compromise", everything we do for them, means we have less than what we began with. Those who dislike us, dislike us. Can't make them like us, no matter what we do, unless we become like them. All of this progressive socialization that is ongoing, I don't and hopefully will not support. I have to work as do others, just to eat, so I pray that I have leaders that will support my beliefs. Cruz has really made me proud. I also just read another rag that 49% of Texans support some type of gun control. What they didn't say was that the support was going to for the forced background checks, or the gunshow loophole, as being suggested. I say no more of this so called compromise, everything we do is seen by those people as giving in, which, I believe only emboldens them to take more.
Re: Senate Judiciary Chair rejects awb.
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:13 am
by anygunanywhere
So exactly how is:
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., called for “common sense reform,” that closes loopholes in current gun laws and enforces background checks.
not caving in on protecting our RKBA?
THIS IS INCREMENTALISM.
NO COMPROMISE.
NO MORE INFRINGEMENT.
NOT ONE MORE INCH.
Anygunanywhere
Re: Senate Judiciary Chair rejects awb.
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:21 am
by jmra
anygunanywhere wrote:So exactly how is:
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., called for “common sense reform,” that closes loopholes in current gun laws and enforces background checks.
not caving in on protecting our RKBA?
THIS IS INCREMENTALISM.
NO COMPROMISE.
NO MORE INFRINGEMENT.
NOT ONE MORE INCH.
Anygunanywhere

Re: Senate Judiciary Chair rejects awb.
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:51 pm
by VMI77
DEB wrote:I was reading KOS where an individual posted that all guns needed to be banned, I know surprised right? But anyhow, the way this individual postulated for this to occur was by making a path to registration, by making it easy for gunowners to comply, by then moving to where the BATF would be allowed to come to your home and insure that the guns did move as intended, by using the media and others to further demonize guns, showing off good gunowners versus those who refuse to comply, and slowly turning the screws until final total ban. I paraphrased quite a bit, but that was the gist of it. Then I read this and it was like everything was falling into the progressive/communist model. I state "no more compromise", everything we do for them, means we have less than what we began with. Those who dislike us, dislike us. Can't make them like us, no matter what we do, unless we become like them. All of this progressive socialization that is ongoing, I don't and hopefully will not support. I have to work as do others, just to eat, so I pray that I have leaders that will support my beliefs. Cruz has really made me proud. I also just read another rag that 49% of Texans support some type of gun control. What they didn't say was that the support was going to for the forced background checks, or the gunshow loophole, as being suggested. I say no more of this so called compromise, everything we do is seen by those people as giving in, which, I believe only emboldens them to take more.
The left-wing wackos have been emboldened by Obama's re-election. They don't just want our guns, they want us dead or in prison. I'm done with even talking to liberals.