Page 2 of 2

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:45 pm
by fickman
OP: are you sure your significant other didn't put that sign in there???

"rlol"

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 4:18 pm
by Beiruty
Let us forget about the 51% sign are the girls attractive and friendly? :mrgreen:

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 4:44 pm
by longtooth
Make sure this does not stray & get it locked for inuendo.
Remember G-rated men.
Be Gentlemen.

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 4:54 pm
by tacticool
Ultra_Solo_Sig_0904 wrote:they're food and other things are :smash: 'ing :thumbs2:
Them's good eatin'?

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:02 am
by Glock_Tacular
Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:41 am
by jmorris
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.

Where are your facts that they are anti-gun?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razor

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:36 am
by bdickens
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?

All they are promoting is that they don't know what sign is what.

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:37 am
by Keith B
jmorris wrote:
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.
Actually, it is illegal. A improperly placed 51% sign is a violation of TABC code. However, I expect they just placed the wrong sign out of ignorance. If I recall correctly they receive both the blue 'Unlicensed Possession' sign and the 51% sign in the packet, so they just put the wrong one up. The local TABC office needs to be called about the improper posting of the 51% sign and they will have them correct it and put up the correct Unlicensed Possession (<51%) sign.

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:48 pm
by Glock_Tacular
jmorris wrote:
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.

Where are your facts that they are anti-gun?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razor

Improper posted 51% is stupidity, sir.

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 3:45 pm
by jmorris
Glock_Tacular wrote:
jmorris wrote:
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.

Where are your facts that they are anti-gun?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razor

Improper posted 51% is stupidity, sir.
Exactly!