Re: Update Notification on Test & CHL100
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:07 pm
Actually, B is still true. :)
and the last one about modified CHL.
and the last one about modified CHL.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Nope. Shocked me too. But according to the instructor the rules do not spell out how the test is to be administered, only that it had to be administered. Based on our "participation" in answering the questions we all passed.dogflight wrote:HOLY COW!jmra wrote: I didn't even see a copy of the test my last class. The instructor read the questions to the group and we all "participated" by answering orally.Wait, you're pulling our legs. Aren't you? Please say yes.
Add in DPS policy that 70% is a passing score on the written exam, it's hard to understand the instructors belief that there are no rules about how the test is to be administered.Sec. 411.188. HANDGUN PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENT.
(d) Only a qualified handgun instructor may administer the proficiency examination to obtain or to renew a license. The proficiency examination must include:
(1) a written section on the subjects listed in Subsection (b); and
(2) a physical demonstration of proficiency...
The questions were "written" on the tv (power point). We each answered each question correctly. That was his argument anyway.dogflight wrote:[Making sure my soapbox is nice and sturdy...]
If we're actually talking about a Texas CHL class here, you might refer the instructor to page 17 of the CHL-16:Add in DPS policy that 70% is a passing score on the written exam, it's hard to understand the instructors belief that there are no rules about how the test is to be administered.Sec. 411.188. HANDGUN PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENT.
(d) Only a qualified handgun instructor may administer the proficiency examination to obtain or to renew a license. The proficiency examination must include:
(1) a written section on the subjects listed in Subsection (b); and
(2) a physical demonstration of proficiency...
Frighteningly for you and the others, it might even be argued that the license of anyone "tested" that way is not valid because they didn't actually demonstrate their proficiency.
[Clambering down from soapbox now.]
dogflight wrote:I was so shocked by the reply to my last post that I forgot why I'd signed on! Ahem:
I just went through the questions and only see three that I would say have been rendered moot by the 2013 changes. Without giving away any specifics about the test, they are:6 Point Star wrote:I have a test with the four questions that no longer apply blacked out...
(A) An even-numbered multiple choice question relating to renewals. Will not apply after 9/1.
(B) An even-numbered T/F question relating to SA/NSA types. Already defunct.
(C) An even-numbered T/F question relating to missing the renewal grace period. Will not apply after 9/1 (unless DPS somehow creates a grace period. The new statute seems clear that renewals shall happen before expiration).
Can you tell me if you agree with my assessment, and which one I am missing?
Thanks!