Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:57 am
by longtooth
Every time I see the Baretta Ghost Buster I tell Mom & Wife good thing we dont carry 92s. Since none of us can say the "G" word that one does not apply either. Never owned either.
I begin to take a little offense when someone treats a Smith badly & marks all over a picture I want to admire before we all 3 enter w/ Springer, Sig & Kel-Tec.

Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:31 pm
by O6nop
Why does everyone refer to this as a "Ghostbuster" sign? I've seen it referred to as "Gun Buster" sign, which seems more appropriate.
I know it's related to the popular movies, but it strikes me wrong to be so generic.
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:34 pm
by Venus Pax
My mom pointed out a ghostbuster sign shortly after I got my CHL. I whispered back, "It's okay, Mom. That's a Beretta. I don't even own one of those. I'm legal here."
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:27 pm
by Kyle Brown
Wildscar wrote:However this

Means nothing to a CHL holder with out a 30.06 sign to go with it.

Not to be picky...but...it has no meaning unless it is posted at the CHL holder's place of employment...then it is considered effective notice to the CHL holder to not carry at the workplace.
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:03 pm
by txinvestigator
Kyle Brown wrote:Wildscar wrote:However this

Means nothing to a CHL holder with out a 30.06 sign to go with it.

Not to be picky...but...it has no meaning unless it is posted at the CHL holder's place of employment...then it is considered effective notice to the CHL holder to not carry at the workplace.
That sign has NO effect on criminal consequence to an employee. Unless the wording is 30.06, the employee can be fired, but not prosecuted.
saw a strange ghostbuster
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:03 pm
by bevans
On the door at Bellaire public works that leads into Bellaire city hall, said somthing to the effect that concealed handguns are banned pusuant to sec.40somthing of the texas penal code. this includes people with concealed handgun lic. ........ i kinda dont pay any attenion as i dont enter the building but if i had to cut through its a pain to go disarm,then backtrack but being as its their city hall i do.
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:00 pm
by KBCraig
Kyle Brown wrote:Not to be picky...but...it has no meaning unless it is posted at the CHL holder's place of employment...then it is considered effective notice to the CHL holder to not carry at the workplace.
Texas CHL Instructor
txinvestigator wrote:That sign has NO effect on criminal consequence to an employee. Unless the wording is 30.06, the employee can be fired, but not prosecuted.
*CHL Instructor*
Can you see why folks sometimes complain about contradictory information coming from CHL instructors?
(And by the way, TXI is correct.)
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:11 pm
by Kyle Brown
txinvestigator wrote:Kyle Brown wrote:Wildscar wrote:However this

Means nothing to a CHL holder with out a 30.06 sign to go with it.

Not to be picky...but...it has no meaning unless it is posted at the CHL holder's place of employment...then it is considered effective notice to the CHL holder to not carry at the workplace.
That sign has NO effect on criminal consequence to an employee. Unless the wording is 30.06, the employee can be fired, but not prosecuted.
Read my post carefully...you will see that I NEVER mentioned criminal consequences...what I did say is the sign does have meaning to a CHL holder if the sign is placed at the CHL holder's place of employment in that the sign is effective notice to the CHL holder/employee to not carry on the premise...Now, that is accurate information...plain and simple
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:13 pm
by Kyle Brown
KBCraig wrote:Kyle Brown wrote:Not to be picky...but...it has no meaning unless it is posted at the CHL holder's place of employment...then it is considered effective notice to the CHL holder to not carry at the workplace.
Texas CHL Instructor
txinvestigator wrote:That sign has NO effect on criminal consequence to an employee. Unless the wording is 30.06, the employee can be fired, but not prosecuted.
*CHL Instructor*
Can you see why folks sometimes complain about contradictory information coming from CHL instructors?
(And by the way, TXI is correct.)
By the way...we ara both "correct"
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:35 pm
by Wildscar
Kyle Brown wrote:By the way...we ara both "correct"
Not to be picky but you mispelled that.
