TexasCHLforum.com

It will be one cold day in hades before I align myself with any transsexual. It will probably be about the same time I accept beastiality, pedophilia and libtards. Again... We aren't talking typical homosexuality... We are talking twisted sick perversion.

cb1000rider wrote:

VoiceofReason wrote:But the gay scouts kept it to themselves which was a real good idea.

It's still a real good idea generally speaking.

VoiceofReason wrote: I have read recently that courts have ruled that a photographer had to take pictures for two men getting married and a bakery had to provide a wedding cake for a same sex marriage. I don’t know what to say to that.

Have any cites? That's just ridiculous. Private businesses should get to decide who they want their clients to be period... *shakes head*
Any private business. Any reason. Period.

But,
Would the law allow a business to decline service to someone because they were black? Many state laws classify homosexuals and more recently same sex marriages as suspect classifications, making them a protected class under anti-discrimination laws just like race and religion. The law says you can not discriminate against a protected class of people. If you are going to deny a gay couple the same professional services you would provide to a heterosexual couple you better have a good lawyer and a lot of money.

You're right.. those are "services" covered under the civil rights act... I guess we did it wrong for too many years. Still, forcing a private business to serve is ridiculous, nevermind a bad idea.