TexasCHLforum.com

03Lightningrocks wrote:What ever it is wildbill, we know he buys the cheap stuff with screw on caps.

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Really? You are actually going to go there?

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

nightmare wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

True. It could have been the shot woman bought the last snow shovel and after losing her cool and blasting her, the other woman made up the story about dropping her gun as cover.

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

True. It could have been the shot woman bought the last snow shovel and after losing her cool and blasting her, the other woman made up the story about dropping her gun as cover.

Let me start this thread from the beginning ...

It was a dark and stormy night ...

WildBill wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

True. It could have been the shot woman bought the last snow shovel and after losing her cool and blasting her, the other woman made up the story about dropping her gun as cover.

Let me start this thread from the beginning ... It was a dark and stormy night ...

Just look and listen to yourselves. 'It ain't me, guys....naw, naw, naw, it ain't me.....'

Oldgringo wrote:

WildBill wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

True. It could have been the shot woman bought the last snow shovel and after losing her cool and blasting her, the other woman made up the story about dropping her gun as cover.

Let me start this thread from the beginning ... It was a dark and stormy night ...

Just look and listen to yourselves. 'It ain't me, guys....naw, naw, naw, it ain't me.....'

Who started this foolishness anyway?

jmra wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:

WildBill wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

True. It could have been the shot woman bought the last snow shovel and after losing her cool and blasting her, the other woman made up the story about dropping her gun as cover.

Let me start this thread from the beginning ... It was a dark and stormy night ...

Just look and listen to yourselves. 'It ain't me, guys....naw, naw, naw, it ain't me.....'

Who started this foolishness anyway?

WildBill wrote:

jmra wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:

WildBill wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

nightmare wrote:

jmra wrote:Did the husband of the gun owner know the injured woman.

Where did it say the shooter was married? Or heterosexual for that matter?

Now that is funny. I took the post by jmra as humor. I took it that he was kidding around that the lady shot a woman her husband was fooling around with.

I'm just saying it doesn't need to be a love triangle.

True. It could have been the shot woman bought the last snow shovel and after losing her cool and blasting her, the other woman made up the story about dropping her gun as cover.

Let me start this thread from the beginning ... It was a dark and stormy night ...

Just look and listen to yourselves. 'It ain't me, guys....naw, naw, naw, it ain't me.....'

Who started this foolishness anyway?

Bet Abraham is loving this.

Does this incident mean that Michael Bloomberg will prompt his MAIG minions to shut down all Lowe's? :-)

SIA

surprise_i'm_armed wrote:Does this incident mean that Michael Bloomberg will prompt his MAIG minions to shut down all Lowe's? :-)

SIA

That or he will move to outlaw purses.

Apparently, it was a cashier that was shot. I hope this doesn't prompt Lowe's to take action and ban guns.
http://cowboystatenews.com/2014/01/02/c ... nne-lowes/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This kind of stuff is very damaging to the public perception of our right to keep and bear arms.

mojo84 wrote:This kind of stuff is very damaging to the public perception of our right to keep and bear arms.

No doubt about it. Not good at all.

My money is on carrying a gun in a purse without a holster.