TexasCHLforum.com

Keith B wrote:A CHL does not get out of a 30.05 just for being a CHL. However, we DO get the exemption if the soul reason for the tresspassing charge was because you're were carrying concealed with a license. The 30.05 charge would only be applicable as a Class C misdemanor at most. As for a 'no ammo' sign, a 5 point sign would not be valid per 30.05 as they must be noticiable.

I think we would still get the exemption as the intent of the posting would be to try and prohibit concealed carry and it would be clear that was their goal and we would have the defense to prosecution.

ScottDLS wrote:

Keith B wrote:A CHL does not get out of a 30.05 just for being a CHL. However, we DO get the exemption if the soul reason for the tresspassing charge was because you're were carrying concealed with a license. The 30.05 charge would only be applicable as a Class C misdemanor at most. As for a 'no ammo' sign, a 5 point sign would not be valid per 30.05 as they must be noticiable.

Fair enough, how about BIG ammo-buster or 30.05 notice as specified in my original post?

I think we would still get the exemption as the intent of the posting would be to try and prohibit concealed carry and it would be clear that was their goal and we would have the defense to prosecution.

I tend to agree but...

There's no CASE LAW? Correct
Are you willing to be the TEST CASE? If need be
Risk TAKING THE RIDE? See above
Have only a DEFENSE? Would prefer an exemption, but that's what we have
What about an ANTI-GUN cop, DA, judge? That's where the Defense to Prosecution comes in
What about the Federal GFSZA for long guns? Now you're throwing in a new twist. Save that for another topic.

----insert additional speculative forum cliches here, please----

We can speculate all day long and throw out 'What If's'. Not gonna play that.