Re: Super Bowl 2015 Commercials
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:31 am
So, was I the only one offended by having to see pete rose on my television screen this weekend?
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
And my point is, until he apologizes to me and every other NRA member that he insulted, anyone using him for advertising deserves to be boycotted. It doesn't matter if they want to muzzle him now, he already said what he did.C-dub wrote:I understand what you're saying and that's why I'm pointing out that he didn't speak freely, which you say he has a right to do. The powers that be also probably didn't want him speaking freely after the barrage of complaints they've received over that other nutbag going on his anti-2A rant a couple years ago.jimlongley wrote:Doesn't matter to me if he followed the script, he still needs to be muzzled. Yes, he has a right to free speech, but not inflammatory stuff like he is responsible for, he has insulted me directly, as a member of the NRA, and deserves to be censured.C-dub wrote:Normally, I would agree, but he didn't get to veer from the script in this one and it used footage from a couple decades ago with the two of them. As with many of these commercials, the content had little to do with the product being advertised. I still thought the premise was funny.jimlongley wrote:Any ad with Gumbel in it should lead to a boycott of the advertiser, I change my wife's TV station when he comes on.
I'm baffled that the hate for Pete is still so strong, considering the criminal history of a great many current professional athletes.PBratton wrote:So, was I the only one offended by having to see pete rose on my television screen this weekend?
I agree. IMHO Pete has paid the price or his wrongdoing and deserves to be in the HOF. I think he will eventually get there posthumously.bigity wrote:I'm baffled that the hate for Pete is still so strong, considering the criminal history of a great many current professional athletes.PBratton wrote:So, was I the only one offended by having to see pete rose on my television screen this weekend?
bigity wrote:I'm baffled that the hate for Pete is still so strong, considering the criminal history of a great many current professional athletes.PBratton wrote:So, was I the only one offended by having to see pete rose on my television screen this weekend?
So, if someone were to be banned from the game they still deserve to be voted into the hall of fame!? Really?Right2Carry wrote:I agree. IMHO Pete has paid the price or his wrongdoing and deserves to be in the HOF. I think he will eventually get there posthumously.bigity wrote:I'm baffled that the hate for Pete is still so strong, considering the criminal history of a great many current professional athletes.PBratton wrote:So, was I the only one offended by having to see pete rose on my television screen this weekend?
IMHO, he shouldn't have been banned for life or from the HOF.PBratton wrote:So, if someone were to be banned from the game they still deserve to be voted into the hall of fame!? Really?Right2Carry wrote:I agree. IMHO Pete has paid the price or his wrongdoing and deserves to be in the HOF. I think he will eventually get there posthumously.bigity wrote:I'm baffled that the hate for Pete is still so strong, considering the criminal history of a great many current professional athletes.PBratton wrote:So, was I the only one offended by having to see pete rose on my television screen this weekend?