Scott Farkus wrote:Doesn't the Governor have executive authority over most every agency other than those headed by another elected official? Is there any reason he can't issue that same directive to those agencies, or at least instruct his appointed agency heads to do so?
Interesting question, and I believe the answer may be that his executive authority may not reach all that far outside of the Office of the Governor even for the agencies that report to him.
I am a relative newcomer to Texas, having arrived for good in 1998, so my view of Texas government is not informed by whatever they teach in schools her, but from my perspective, the government is designed to diffuse power, to avoid concentrating it in anyone place --hence the number of top level executive positions that are elected rather than appointed.
It is further my working hypothesis that this diffusion is continued into the lower levels of executive governance. For example, the Department of Public Safety falls within the purview of the Governor. However, it appears to me that his direct control over the department is limited. By the Texas Constitution, "The Public Safety Commission controls the department." Period dot. The Governor appoints members of the Public Safety Commission, but only at the rate of one or two per year (six total members), and it does not appear he can remove them once appointed. He can choose and remove the commission chairman at his pleasure, but the members serve six year terms, and I don't think he can just replace them unless they die or are removed via legal process. (Non-relevant factoid: I was interested to note that you must be able to get a Secret-level security clearance from the Feds to serve on the PSC). I suspect this template of isolating the Governor's direct power over subordinate agencies is replicated throughout the government, given the (dizzying) number of commissions and boards there are supervising things.
Thus I don't think the Gov can just issue an "executive order" or any other order and just tell the various agencies to permit their personnel to carry under authority of the LTC. He certainly can influence things via appointments and budgetary power and bully pulpit, but I don't think direct intervention into personnel policies is within his legal powers.
I suspect at least part of this is by design, perhaps as a result of past battles in Texas history (such as when the Texas Rangers took sides in a gubernatorial dispute), and some it is probably old-fashioned power struggles between factions in and out of government and the legislature.
If there is anyone here who is schooled on the design (or lack thereof) of the Texas Constitution and how all this works, I am happy to be educated.