TexasCHLforum.com

c.edgington wrote:

Taypo wrote:

MONGOOSE wrote:I believe they all can be charged but you can't just pray and spay back.....might be wrong .

Per the article, he fired a single round and struck a criminal. How exactly is that "pray and spray?". It's exactly the opposite - a dang good shot.

MONGOOSE wrote:I believe they all can be charged but you can't just pray and spay back.....might be wrong .

My dad was a veterinarian and a religious man. He always prayed before he spayed.

Sounds like a good policy

puma guy wrote:

MONGOOSE wrote:I believe they all can be charged but you can't just pray and spay back.....might be wrong .

My dad was a veterinarian and a religious man. He always prayed before he spayed.

puma guy wrote:

MONGOOSE wrote:I believe they all can be charged but you can't just pray and spay back.....might be wrong .

My dad was a veterinarian and a religious man. He always prayed before he spayed.

Well played, sir.

Taypo wrote:

MONGOOSE wrote:I believe they all can be charged but you can't just pray and spay back.....might be wrong .

Per the article, he fired a single round and struck a criminal. How exactly is that "pray and spray?". It's exactly the opposite - a dang good shot.

Are you guys reading the same article that I did?
The article I saw said, "The homeowner returned fire. One of his bullets....."

MONGOOSE wrote:In his case he didn't. I was saying in general.

Can you guys not read?

MONGOOSE wrote:They were driving away ........firing on fleeing suspects is a Bozo No No

They were still a threat and might come back again.

rp_photo wrote:

MONGOOSE wrote:They were driving away ........firing on fleeing suspects is a Bozo No No

They were still a threat and might come back again.

Matters not....mighta coulda

Teens?

If you're shooting at me, with the potential of killing me, my loved ones, my neighbors, I'm supposed to be swayed to not return fire because you're a teenager and that confers immunity?

Puh-leeze.

If they are no longer posing a threat (fleeing) you better not fire. If they still pose a threat....fire away.....I don't care what age they are

MONGOOSE wrote:If they are no longer posing a threat (fleeing) you better not fire. If they still pose a threat....fire away.....I don't care what age they are

Obviously it is situation dependent, but if they are fleeing and shooting they still pose a threat. In that case I will still shoot. Also, I can't imagine I would convict a guy, if I were to be on a jury, if he shot someone who had just tried to shoot him. Honestly I wouldn't care if they were fleeing after the fact.

Your.not much good to your family when you are in jail. You can't soot a person in the back here unless you are a COP

MONGOOSE wrote:Your.not much good to your family when you are in jail. You can't soot a person in the back here unless you are a COP

Um, yes, you can. Read Chapter 9 of the Penal Code.

MONGOOSE wrote:Your.not much good to your family when you are in jail. You can't soot a person in the back here unless you are a COP

He wasn't trying to shoot anyone in the back. He was returning fire.

You seem to to be doing everything you can to put some kind of guilt on the homeowner. So far you've accused him of shooting at fleeing suspects, spraying and praying and now shooting people in the back. Is there something you'd like to share with the group?