Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:43 pm
DONE
TexasCHLforum.com
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Page 2 of 3
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:53 pm
Done
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 3:16 pm
Done!
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 3:28 pm
I already sent in the e mail now do what I did and make a special contribution to the N.R.A.
NOW!!!
NOW!!!
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 3:58 pm
Already done. Both for me and my wife.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:40 pm
DoneLSUTiger wrote:Don't let Congress pass anti-gun measures in wake of recent tragedy!
Contact your legislators!
https://act.nraila.org/takeaction.aspx?AlertID=261
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:55 pm
Did it yesterday - did it again today with a different letter.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:26 pm
I've sent four now to all my my representatives.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:12 pm
Sent the email yesterday as soon as I received it.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:17 pm
If you are a Texas resident and you are contacting our senators you are preaching to the choir. If your representative is a republican same thing. Now if you are stuck in a democratic controlled precinct that's a different story. I got the call from NRA too. You will all get a form letter back eventually from your elected reps.
What is more upsetting is that the senate didn't just let the democrats filibuster this forever, shut the government down if need be rather than submitting in to having a vote on gun bills. If the situation was reversed Harry Reid wouldn't have given in. Maybe we need to send some testosterone Rx to our republican friends.
What is more upsetting is that the senate didn't just let the democrats filibuster this forever, shut the government down if need be rather than submitting in to having a vote on gun bills. If the situation was reversed Harry Reid wouldn't have given in. Maybe we need to send some testosterone Rx to our republican friends.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 9:03 pm
Votes on Monday.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/s ... un-control
Keep emailing, calling, faxing, etc.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/s ... un-control
Keep emailing, calling, faxing, etc.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 10:30 pm
Emails sent:
Rep. Lloyd Alton Doggett (DEM)
Sen. John Cornyn (REP)
Sen. Ted E. Cruz (REP)
Rep. Lloyd Alton Doggett (DEM)
Sen. John Cornyn (REP)
Sen. Ted E. Cruz (REP)
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:09 pm
Another donation sent to the NRA.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:15 pm
they called me three times yesterday..all three lines..after the second..i got a bit irritated.
they only had my one number, but felt they needed to call all three?
thats two less they touched.
they only had my one number, but felt they needed to call all three?
thats two less they touched.
Re: NRA- ILA Call to Action!
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:58 am
I had actually already contacted both Texas Senators, although I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir with them.
I added a comment though, that IF any restrictions on firearm ownership were added, it should be done in conjunction with a national right-to-carry act. Historically, I wasn't in favor of the Feds overriding the states by forcing recognition of state licenses to carry. However, in light of recent SCOTUS rulings doing the same, I'm inclined to think differently. If we have a right to self-defense, it shouldn't end at the state line. If the intent is to restrict gun ownership by "People who shouldn't have them", it should also be recognized that the rights of "Those who should have firearms" must be protected.
Just my 2ยข
--
I added a comment though, that IF any restrictions on firearm ownership were added, it should be done in conjunction with a national right-to-carry act. Historically, I wasn't in favor of the Feds overriding the states by forcing recognition of state licenses to carry. However, in light of recent SCOTUS rulings doing the same, I'm inclined to think differently. If we have a right to self-defense, it shouldn't end at the state line. If the intent is to restrict gun ownership by "People who shouldn't have them", it should also be recognized that the rights of "Those who should have firearms" must be protected.
Just my 2ยข
--