mupepe wrote:cbunt1 wrote:I think the ~$600 for a 650 is the bare press. You'll still need dies and a case feeder.
One thing to note: The Hornady works quite well without the case feeder, I consider it an add-on, and a nice touch, but the press is designed to operate without the case feeder.
The Dillon 650 is NOT designed to run without a case feeder. It will run without one, and a friend of mine ran one for 2+ years without a case feeder...but I can assure you that's not how it's designed to run, and it's not especially friendly to operating without the feeder.
I consider a Dillon 650 without a case feeder to be an incomplete machine, so do yourself a favor and factor in the cost of a case feeder at minimum.
It's a matter of personal preference as to which is a "better" machine...there are things I like better about each machine, so everything is a trade-off.
They're both excellent machines.
I appreciate this. If you don't mind, could you list your pros and cons for each machine? And yes, you're correct. The $600 is the bare press although it comes with one shell holder plate for the caliber of your choice.
I can try :)
First let me say that a Hornady AP IMO is more closely compared to Dillon 550 rather than a 650, due to the fact that it's designed to run without a case feeder, while the D-650 is designed to run WITH a case feeder...different animals. In practice, the way most of us use them, the AP represents a "step between" the 550 and the 650 in the Dillon line.
For full disclosure, I've never owned a Hornady LnL, but I've used a friend's unit. I've owned a Lee Loadmaster and a D-650, and have used a friend's D-1050.
Hornady Pros:
-- Smoother indexing machine (1/2 step on each half-cycle of the handle)
-- Primer management system is a little easier to clean up when it stops
-- Less expense associated with "easy" caliber changes
Hornady Cons:
-- The primer mechanism is a little more prone to stoppage than the Dillon, until you get it all lined out and broken in.
-- A little more opportunity for error/misalignment on caliber changes.
Dillon pros:
-- The "system" approach and toolheads with individual powder measures make caliber switch simpler, even if slower.
-- Lifetime warranty
-- A whole world of accessories and minor improvements available
Dillon cons:
-- Upfront cost. Undeniably the most expensive unit. The way it's marketed is somewhat misleading; a 650 as it should be is an additional $3-400 over the marked price.
-- The indexing system is prone to powder spillage; this can be helped with some simple modifications and adding a bearing.
-- On the rare occasion that it's truly out of alignment, it is a hassle to pull back in spec.
-- Accessory cost. As much as I like the Dillon's gear, I have to admit that you can buy better, but you can't pay more.
I can (and have) written entire articles about presses, press usage, and so on. It's worth noting that the Dillon APPEARS to be more expensive on caliber changes, but it doesn't HAVE to be -- one can change dies on a single Dillon toolhead just like on any other press. As such, when I talk about being more expensive (or less hassle) I have to qualify everything by saying "when used as designed."
At the risk of further confusing the discussion, IMO the Hornady is a better MACHINE, but the Dillon is a better SYSTEM. That said, the Dillon works best as a SYSTEM. It'll work with any dies, for example, but IME it works better with Dillon dies...
I'm sure I can think of more as I process it, but that's some high-level thoughts.