Re: CA: Maybe already too late for them
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:03 pm
The article said he was holding the teen until backup arrived. I assume he must have already called 911.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Eventually? A cop in california already is expected to enforce a plethora of obviously unconstitutional laws.The Annoyed Man wrote:I don't know why any one in California would want to be a cop there. The first big wave of departures was people leaving the state to follow their jobs. The next wave of departures will be LEOs, Firemen, and Paramedics, who are very tired of having to daily face a rabble that no longer has any respect for authority. Eventually, the police departments will be staffed with unqualified thugs and released felons as the state's gov't tries to fill the ranks with the "victims of oppression". At that point, police depts will no longer be police, but rather the enforcement arms of the various bureaucracies run by SJWs.
Wadsworth and Shakespeare (Hamlet) are wrong. It is our responsibility to know where our arrows land.KLB wrote:California is a mess, but why did he fire into the air? Why not the ground--if a warning shot was necessary?
Wordsworth didn't mean anything quite so literal, but the point is close enough that it comes to mind:
The Arrow and the Song
By Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
I shot an arrow into the air,
It fell to earth, I knew not where;
For, so swiftly it flew, the sight
Could not follow it in its flight.
I breathed a song into the air,
It fell to earth, I knew not where;
For who has sight so keen and strong,
That it can follow the flight of song?
Long, long afterward, in an oak
I found the arrow, still unbroke;
And the song, from beginning to end,
I found again in the heart of a friend.
I think that was actually Wadsworth's point.EdnaBambrick wrote:Wadsworth and Shakespeare (Hamlet) are wrong. It is our responsibility to know where our arrows land.KLB wrote:California is a mess, but why did he fire into the air? Why not the ground--if a warning shot was necessary?
Wordsworth didn't mean anything quite so literal, but the point is close enough that it comes to mind:
The Arrow and the Song
By Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
I shot an arrow into the air,
It fell to earth, I knew not where;
For, so swiftly it flew, the sight
Could not follow it in its flight.
I breathed a song into the air,
It fell to earth, I knew not where;
For who has sight so keen and strong,
That it can follow the flight of song?
Long, long afterward, in an oak
I found the arrow, still unbroke;
And the song, from beginning to end,
I found again in the heart of a friend.
I'm not sure the shot was intentional.KLB wrote:California is a mess, but why did he fire into the air? Why not the ground--if a warning shot was necessary?
It looks like he's getting a pass and they're charging an unarmed teen instead. Any bets if an off duty plumber who grabbed a gun to confront kids cutting across his lawn would get the same break in California?o b juan wrote:Warning shots are (wait for it) "DEADLY FORCE" Regardles of up or down!!
A thirteen year old of his word as he sued the police officer for emotional distress today.Mike S wrote:
As to why the adult didn't just let it go? He says on video that the young lad said "Man, I'll shoot you!". Lad refutes this on video, saying he said "sue you", not "shoot you". What was really said? Ain't got a clue.