TexasCHLforum.com

cheezit wrote:Are the police really required to do anything ? Doesn't warren vs DC cover that.

If people are gathering and demonstrating without a permit, I would think that would be a violation of the law and should be enforced...... Turn it around and I bet they would have.

WTR wrote:

cheezit wrote:Are the police really required to do anything ? Doesn't warren vs DC cover that.

If people are gathering and demonstrating without a permit, I would think that would be a violation of the law and should be enforced...... Turn it around and I bet they would have.

WTR wrote:

cheezit wrote:Are the police really required to do anything ? Doesn't warren vs DC cover that.

If people are gathering and demonstrating without a permit, I would think that would be a violation of the law and should be enforced...... Turn it around and I bet they would have.

Can someone help me understand why a "permit" is needed in order to assemble on public land? I can understand a permit in order to reserve a park or a pavilion for example. This would show that you have priority to use the grounds for which you are permitted. One group had a permit to use the park. What would happen if a group reserved a pavilion at a park and were unable to use it because some other group was occupying it and refusing to leave?

Flightmare wrote:

WTR wrote:

cheezit wrote:Are the police really required to do anything ? Doesn't warren vs DC cover that.

If people are gathering and demonstrating without a permit, I would think that would be a violation of the law and should be enforced...... Turn it around and I bet they would have.

Can someone help me understand why a "permit" is needed in order to assemble on public land? I can understand a permit in order to reserve a park or a pavilion for example. This would show that you have priority to use the grounds for which you are permitted. One group had a permit to use the park. What would happen if a group reserved a pavilion at a park and were unable to use it because some other group was occupying it and refusing to leave?

You made need a permit for city streets to be closed.

WTR wrote:

Flightmare wrote:

WTR wrote:

cheezit wrote:Are the police really required to do anything ? Doesn't warren vs DC cover that.

If people are gathering and demonstrating without a permit, I would think that would be a violation of the law and should be enforced...... Turn it around and I bet they would have.

Can someone help me understand why a "permit" is needed in order to assemble on public land? I can understand a permit in order to reserve a park or a pavilion for example. This would show that you have priority to use the grounds for which you are permitted. One group had a permit to use the park. What would happen if a group reserved a pavilion at a park and were unable to use it because some other group was occupying it and refusing to leave?

You made need a permit for city streets to be closed.

Fair enough, but was that the case in Charlottesville?

I have no idea what the permit entailed.

Sign petition to get Antifa declared a terrorist organization:

http://www.standunited.org/petition/pre ... #sign_form

And now this!:

Dallas mayor calls for task force to review Confederate statue removal

http://www.fox4news.com/news/273969718-story

It is clear to me that Soros groups just want to stir the pot and provoke civil unrest. They could frankly give rats behind about statues. It's the disruption of our society that they are aiming at.

Buckle up folks.

Bitter Clinger wrote:Sign petition to get Antifa declared a terrorist organization:

http://www.standunited.org/petition/pre ... #sign_form

Done.

parabelum wrote:It is clear to me that Soros groups just want to stir the pot and provoke civil unrest. They could frankly give rats behind about statues. It's the disruption of our society that they are aiming at.

Buckle up folks.

I saw the best response on FB yesterday explaining this incident:
"An idiot racist drove into a crowd of idiot racist protesting more idiot racist."

parabelum wrote:It is clear to me that Soros groups just want to stir the pot and provoke civil unrest. They could frankly give rats behind about statues. It's the disruption of our society that they are aiming at.

Buckle up folks.

with caveat that there are plenty of people in the globalist camp financing these actions. Hillary Clinton just donated a huge some of money from her campaign fund to her "Resistance" organization.(http://freebeacon.com/issues/hillary-cl ... nce-group/ ) There are D's and there are R's totally onboard the globalist/communist movement - and very few innocents at any level of government- local, state and federal. If you believe your local government isn't part of the globalists agenda, its probably because they haven't revealed it yet like so many have since Nov 8th.

Bitter Clinger wrote:

Hmmm....are grave markers of Confederate soldiers "racist" and require removal as well? Perhaps the communists and globalists will get to them when they are through having any public statues, etc removed. Dig them all up and put them in mass unmarked graves with other deplorables.