Re: Looking at Glock 43 w/ext mag and Shield, the problem is..
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:05 pm
I have 2 shields, 9mm and .45. Both go bang when I pull the trigger and they are very thin! One has the mag guts. 

The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
They’re pretty much the same size, both are 5-shot J-frame’s with 1-7/8” barrels. The differences - other than color - are a scandium frame, an XS Sight Systems big dot tritium front sight, and the .357 magnum caliber on the 340; versus an aluminum alloy frame, a plain ramp front sight, and +P .38 Special for the 342. Both guns have the same Uncle Mike’s boot grip. The 340 weighs 13.8 oz to the 342’s 14.4 oz, so it is .6 oz lighter. I don’t know if that’s enough to make a difference for most people, but it is a really light pistol. My wife has a 642CT, but she carries a G43.cmgee67 wrote:TAM how is that compared in size to the 642? My wife has the 642 and I love that little gun. I would like to get one as well but I’d like the 357 option instead of only 38’s.
That’s pretty much what it felt like.Best description I could think of was shooting that was like driving a motorcycle at 45 mph and slapping a mailbox while you drive by.