TexasCHLforum.com

carlson1 wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:54 pm

Maxwell wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:45 pm

Misfit Child wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 7:42 pm

philip964 wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 1:12 pm Sorry it was First Daughter she called a feckless C word not the First Lady. My mistake.

Any bets whether her show will be cancelled as quickly as Roseanne?

We wish...

It is amazing this woman’s show is not a live show. That means everyone knew what was said and they aired the show anyways. I doubt serously because of that this show will be cancelled.

dale blanker wrote: Fri Jun 01, 2018 1:37 pm

carlson1 wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:54 pm

Maxwell wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:45 pm

Misfit Child wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 7:42 pm

philip964 wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 1:12 pm Sorry it was First Daughter she called a feckless C word not the First Lady. My mistake.

Any bets whether her show will be cancelled as quickly as Roseanne?

We wish...

It is amazing this woman’s show is not a live show. That means everyone knew what was said and they aired the show anyways. I doubt serously because of that this show will be cancelled.

Sure, Samantha Bee should be trashed and lack of commercial support will probably do it anyway. On the other hand, it's hard to compare profanity with racism.

dale blanker wrote: Fri Jun 01, 2018 1:37 pm

carlson1 wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:54 pm

Maxwell wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:45 pm

Misfit Child wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 7:42 pm

philip964 wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 1:12 pm Sorry it was First Daughter she called a feckless C word not the First Lady. My mistake.

Any bets whether her show will be cancelled as quickly as Roseanne?

We wish...

It is amazing this woman’s show is not a live show. That means everyone knew what was said and they aired the show anyways. I doubt serously because of that this show will be cancelled.

Sure, Samantha Bee should be trashed and lack of commercial support will probably do it anyway. On the other hand, it's hard to compare profanity with racism.

This is a "G" rated "family" forum, so please keep this in mind when choosing the subject matter of your post, as well as the language you choose. Additional specific rules are as follows:

TexasCHLforum Rules:

1. No profanity, pseudo-profanity, or abbreviated profanity. If you are in doubt about a word, don't use it. Any profanity substitute that gets the profane message across is prohibited!

philbo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:21 am Trump proclaims "I have the absolute right to PARDON myself" this morning. This followed a weekend of cronies trying to sell the idea that a president can't commit obstruction of justice... If this is true (and I don't believe for a minute that it is), can you imagine what the next democrat in office could be allowed to do by such a precedent?!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... op+News%29

Bitter Clinger wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:55 amGotta love it. Virtue signaling as an art among DemocRats.

philbo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:21 am Trump proclaims "I have the absolute right to PARDON myself" this morning. This followed a weekend of cronies trying to sell the idea that a president can't commit obstruction of justice... If this is true (and I don't believe for a minute that it is), can you imagine what the next democrat in office could be allowed to do by such a precedent?!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... op+News%29

bbhack wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:01 pmThe process to bring a president to justice is impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate. Period, full stop. In that sense, he is legally different than everyone else. It has to be that way if you want a county called the US to live in.

philbo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:54 am

Bitter Clinger wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:55 amGotta love it. Virtue signaling as an art among DemocRats.

I'm trying to figure out the point (if there was one) to your response, but any point seems to have been lost in such an obtuse statement and unrelated graphic.

philbo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:20 pm ...
Agreed that the process to remove a sitting president is thru impeachment, but does mean that a president can not commit obstruction per se? or that a president could pardon himself without consequence? or that a sitting president is above the law? I think not, or the next obama will have a field day in office. The ideas floating trump's positions on these issues are at best not well though out, or worse, are garbage designed as distraction.

philbo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:20 pm

bbhack wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:01 pmThe process to bring a president to justice is impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate. Period, full stop. In that sense, he is legally different than everyone else. It has to be that way if you want a county called the US to live in.

Agreed that the process to remove a sitting president is thru impeachment, but does mean that a president can not commit obstruction per se? or that a president could pardon himself without consequence? or that a sitting president is above the law? I think not, or the next obama will have a field day in office. The ideas floating trump's positions on these issues are at best not well though out, or worse, are garbage designed as distraction.

Bitter Clinger wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:29 pm

philbo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:54 am

Bitter Clinger wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:55 amGotta love it. Virtue signaling as an art among DemocRats.

I'm trying to figure out the point (if there was one) to your response, but any point seems to have been lost in such an obtuse statement and unrelated graphic.

The fact that the point is lost on you is exactly the point.

Bitter Clinger wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:29 pmThe fact that the point is lost on you is exactly the point.

bbhack wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:31 pm ... Maybe a blanket pardon of his own self on the last day in office? That is fully in the middle of banana republic territory.