The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
What crops are those?RPB wrote:Allergy season is here.
Also, now that I'm a non-smoker, when the smoke from Mexico burning their crop fields should arrive soon. I imagine my eyes will burn more and I'll get my air purifiers ready.
WildBill wrote:What crops are those?RPB wrote:Allergy season is here.
Also, now that I'm a non-smoker, when the smoke from Mexico burning their crop fields should arrive soon. I imagine my eyes will burn more and I'll get my air purifiers ready.
dunnoI think Austin is a no-smoke allowed city now, perhaps they can mail a citation for Mexico to pay.Friday 04/27/12
Winds should be strong enough to generate blowing dust in parts of the Panhandle and could possibly raise the daily PM10 AQI into the "Moderate" range in the Lubbock area, with highest concentrations from late morning into the early evening. Satellite imagery indicates light amounts of smoke from agricultural burning in Mexico and Central America moving into the Texas coast this morning but surface concentrations do not appear to be enough to raise the daily PM2.5 AQI beyond the "Good" range. Elsewhere in the state, moderate to strong winds and low incoming background levels should help to keep air quality in the "Good" range.
Saturday 04/28/12
Smoke from agricultural burning in Mexico and Central America should increase in South Texas
Sunday 04/29/12 Outlook
Patchy smoke from agricultural burning in Mexico and Central America should cover much of the middle of the state and will likely spread into Northwest Texas
etc etc
That explains the decline in the quality of the BBQ. I thought it was the influx of Yankees.RPB wrote:I think Austin is a no-smoke allowed city now, perhaps they can mail a citation for Mexico to pay.
That's too young to die.LikesShinyThings wrote:<clearing throat> <tapping mike> Is this thing on?
We can't let it die on it's 2nd birthday.
Wow.sjfcontrol wrote:Good to see my old friend again. I had no idea it was two years old.
But too old to rock n roll.WildBill wrote:That's too young to die.
You're NEVER too old to rock 'n roll!Moby Duck wrote:But too old to rock n roll.WildBill wrote:That's too young to die.
Just ask Keith Richards, how that man is still alive is a mystery to me.sjfcontrol wrote:You're NEVER too old to rock 'n roll!Moby Duck wrote:But too old to rock n roll.WildBill wrote:That's too young to die.
Yes, but this thread is beautifully politics-free. And fancifully full of non-sequitors.sjfcontrol wrote:Actually, it's embarrassing that this thread is only up to 113 pages after more than two years, when the "17y/o" Travon Martin thread is up to 76 pages after a mere three months.
Not any more...texasmusic wrote:The Travon martin thread is 17 years old?
