TexasCHLforum.com

What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?

Roger Howard wrote:Amandment 3 tabled

This is the result of a LOT of work!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chas.

I find it amazing how the progressive democrats are worried about private property rights when it is convenient and helps further their cause. Otherwise, private property owners have to allow anyone and everyone on the property and do business with anyone and everyone.

TVGuy wrote:What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?

Must vote from their own desk and cannot vote for another Member.

Chas.

Here comes a "common sense" amendment.

I agree that retention holsters are important, but I don't think they should be mandatory. When I'm out in the woods by myself or only with friends, I don't need retention. These people just assume you're always going to be carrying in an urban, crowded environment.

I disagree with it but I can see how some of the members could fall for Canales' level 2 amendment.

Better have one of them "leather thumbreakers".

Please don't break my thumbs, Texas!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

TVGuy wrote:What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?

Must vote from their own desk and cannot vote for another Member.

Chas.

Thank you, Charles. Any idea of a reason Stickland would do that?

TVGuy wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

TVGuy wrote:What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?

Must vote from their own desk and cannot vote for another Member.

Chas.

Thank you, Charles. Any idea of a reason Stickland would do that?

Not that I can post.

Chas.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

Roger Howard wrote:Amandment 3 tabled

This is the result of a LOT of work!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chas.

Thanks for everything you guys do to help advance pro-2A legislation!

Oh god.

Kids will die if you don't vote to mandate retention devices.

Who is the ninnyhammer proselytizing retention?

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

TVGuy wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

TVGuy wrote:What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?

Must vote from their own desk and cannot vote for another Member.

Chas.

Thank you, Charles. Any idea of a reason Stickland would do that?

Not that I can post.

Chas.

Probably because of the same reasons that are running through my head. I can't post those thoughts either or you or Keith would bust me again for being a bad guy.

Blood in the streets again.