I suspect that it's more of a case of which protocols to follow, rather than a lack of protocols entirely. These nurses are trained and have experience in general protocols for infectious disease. If any of them has been out of nursing school for more than a few months, it is a safe bet that they have already cared for HIV, full-blown AIDS, and hepatitis patients, as well as other patients with other communicable blood/body-fluid borne diseases. These may be fairly rare and thinly distributed diseases "out in the world", but they are found in more highly concentrated numbers in hospitals, for the simple reason of why hospitals exist in the first place.sjfcontrol wrote:There's been another (second) health care worker in Dallas with ebola. News last night gave a scathing report regarding the "protocols" (or lack thereof) in Dallas.
It's not like they had NO protocols. They may have had insufficient protocols. But nosocomial infections are a big deal, nurses are educated in their existence, and they are generally VERY aware of the risks of acquiring one themselves simply because of the environment in which they work.
The problem here isn't the nurses. The problem has two sources: 1) the contagious nature of the disease itself; and 2) confusing directives coming from inefficient bureaucracies on how to manage that disease. The nurses will do what they are taught and/or told, because it is in their self-interest to do so......at least that is where they put their faith. But if they are told "do this.........no, do that", then they are at risk, and the BLAME belongs on the shoulders of whoever gave them conflicting directives, not on the shoulders of nurses who tried in good conscience to carry out those directives.
The very first time I heard that jerkwad from CDC blame the sick nurse for "breaking protocol", I wanted to slap him and tell him "YOU put on all that gear and get YOUR narrow behind into that room and treat that patient, then YOU deal with the standards that YOU impose........and may God have mercy on you."
CDC would like us to think that they are infallible, and that the blame for patient-to-nurse transmission falls on the nurse's shoulders; because that takes our eyes off of some larger truths......that CDC, being a bureaucracy more than it is a healthcare agency, is driven by other agendae which may have nothing at all to do with controlling the spread of disease, and everything to do with enabling the social engineering goals of a particular political entity. How ELSE do you explain that CDC says we should not close our airspace to inbound commercial air traffic from those nations where Ebola originates, at least until this crisis is over? They say it would be a hindrance to getting doctors and other healthcare workers to the affected nations. But in a nation where government has the power to BOTH cut off such inbound traffic AND provide chartered and/or military flights to any medical team that needs to travel back and forth, that is a FLAT OUT LIE.
Why are they lying, unless it is that they put their political mission ahead of their medical mission? Does anybody seriously think that one gets appointed as Director of CDC without being considered politically reliable by the person doing the appointing? I submit the following: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-off ... c-director
Kathleen Sebelius....... now there's a recommendation for you....THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________
For Immediate Release May, 15 2009
President Obama Appoints Dr. Thomas Frieden as CDC Director
Applauds Acting Director Besser’s leadership on H1N1 flu response; Dr. Besser will continue to lead CDC’s Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response
WASHINGTON – Today, President Barack Obama announced that he has appointed Dr. Thomas Frieden, currently Commissioner of the New York City Health Department, as Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
President Obama also announced that Acting CDC Director Dr. Rich Besser, who has led the CDC’s Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response for the past four years, will continue in this role.
President Obama said, "America relies on a strong public health system and the work at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is critical to our mission to preserve and protect the health and safety of our citizens. Dr. Frieden is an expert in preparedness and response to health emergencies, and has been at the forefront of the fight against heart disease, cancer and obesity, infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and AIDS, and in the establishment of electronic health records. Dr. Frieden has been a leader in the fight for health care reform, and his experiences confronting public health challenges in our country and abroad will be essential in this new role."
President Obama added, "Secretary Sebelius and I thank Acting CDC Director Dr. Rich Besser and the women and men throughout the CDC for their superb work, especially over the past weeks. Dr. Besser has led the CDC’s Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response for the past four years, and those preparations were essential during the recent H1N1 flu detection and response activities. We are very pleased he will continue in that role."
Frieden will begin his work at the CDC in early June.

Putting the blame on the nurses for "breaking protocol" is like an army general putting the blame on an individual artilleryman for failing to drop ordnance onto a critical enemy target during a fire mission when the battle hung in the balance, when that artilleryman DID hit exactly the coordinates the general gave him. What possible motivation would that soldier have to not follow orders? What possible motivation would the general have to blame the artilleryman...... unless the general knew the coordinates he gave the artilleryman were wrong? In terms of practical application, it doesn't matter whether the incorrect coordinates were deliberately wrong or a mistake, the artilleryman is not to blame for missing the target if he hit the target he was given.
In recent years, the CDC's energies have been devoted more to issues like "proving" that private gun ownership is a health hazard, than they have been devoted to protecting this nation from the importation of diseases by future democrat voters.