The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
No, the amendment to the amendment must be dealt with first.K5GU wrote:Don't they need to vote on Amendment 9 before addressing the amendment to the amendment??
I thought they had to vote Amendment 9 before addressing an amendment-to-the-amendment.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I realize that, but it's Huffines fault.Vol Texan wrote:This is Huffman's idea, not Huffine's.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.You forget your wallet and now it's going to be a felony? (It's already a Class A.) Huffines is an idiot and he wants to run for Congress. He fits right in with OCT, Grisham, NAGR/Dudley Brown. Anti-gun Democrats are laughing their tails off.
Chas.
Chas.
I surmise she is just trying to increase the penalty to persuade people from doing it, realizing this amendment might pass, JMHOCharles L. Cotton wrote:I realize that, but it's Huffines fault.Vol Texan wrote:This is Huffman's idea, not Huffine's.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
The current law requires you to have your CHL on you if you are carrying. If you don't, you can still be arrested and convicted. It doesn't happen because 1) concealed-carry is a non-issue; and 2) it's a misdemeanor. If it's a felony that's greater incentive to make the arrest (COPs like to make felony arrests) plus it will become law because of the Huffines amendment that LEOs view as a slap in the face.troglodyte wrote:I'm a little slow. How does this change from the way it is now? Just because you can't (or don't) produce your CHL when asked for ID there is no penalty. How does changing the severity of unlicensed carry change this? I can see you may be detained and it may take some time to get straightened out but wouldn't the "no penalty" still apply?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.
Chas.
Roger. Thanks.Charles L. Cotton wrote:No, the amendment to the amendment must be dealt with first.K5GU wrote:Don't they need to vote on Amendment 9 before addressing the amendment to the amendment??
Chas.
And if the House doesn't go along with it, and it very well may not, then we could be at an dead end just as we were last session when HB508 went down in flames.safety1 wrote:I surmise she is just trying to increase the penalty to persuade people from doing it, realizing this amendment might pass, JMHOCharles L. Cotton wrote:I realize that, but it's Huffines fault.Vol Texan wrote:This is Huffman's idea, not Huffine's.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
Appears to me that Huffman is doing the grandstanding now.Charles L. Cotton wrote:And if the House doesn't go along with it, and it very well may not, then we could be at an dead end just as we were last session when HB508 went down in flames.safety1 wrote:I surmise she is just trying to increase the penalty to persuade people from doing it, realizing this amendment might pass, JMHOCharles L. Cotton wrote:I realize that, but it's Huffines fault.Vol Texan wrote:This is Huffman's idea, not Huffine's.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
People, I don't think anyone realizes just how urgent this situation is. If HB910 goes down, so does campus-carry. All because an idiot wants to grandstand.
Chas.
Some people here think that's his end game. I am inclined to believe them.Charles L. Cotton wrote:And if the House doesn't go along with it, and it very well may not, then we could be at an dead end just as we were last session when HB508 went down in flames.safety1 wrote:I surmise she is just trying to increase the penalty to persuade people from doing it, realizing this amendment might pass, JMHOCharles L. Cotton wrote:I realize that, but it's Huffines fault.Vol Texan wrote:This is Huffman's idea, not Huffine's.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
People, I don't think anyone realizes just how urgent this situation is. If HB910 goes down, so does campus-carry. All because an idiot wants to grandstand.
Chas.
..Just as will be the candidates next time...Charles L. Cotton wrote:And if the House doesn't go along with it, and it very well may not, then we could be at an dead end just as we were last session when HB508 went down in flames.safety1 wrote:I surmise she is just trying to increase the penalty to persuade people from doing it, realizing this amendment might pass, JMHOCharles L. Cotton wrote:I realize that, but it's Huffines fault.Vol Texan wrote:This is Huffman's idea, not Huffine's.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now that's just fantastic.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I think she wants to increase punishments for those who cannot produce a CHL if asked by LEOs under circumstances which the Huffines amendment would permit.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Did she say what it was?
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
People, I don't think anyone realizes just how urgent this situation is. If HB910 goes down, so does campus-carry. All because an idiot wants to grandstand.
Chas.