Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Posted: Wed May 27, 2015 9:52 pm
kenny rogers - the gamblerharrycallahan wrote:
Journey?
Oh, Neil Diamond?
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
kenny rogers - the gamblerharrycallahan wrote:
Journey?
Oh, Neil Diamond?
But penalty reduction and licensed open carry don't benefit the president of OCT.sugar land dave wrote:That is what I meant by my earlier post about OCT people not taking an easy 90 % win. If I had my choice, I would have taken that penalty reduction even over open carry, but we could have had them both.Charles L. Cotton wrote:That will be a bigger loss than open-carry.Tracker wrote:what nobody is talking about but what I'm seeing is that if HB910 dies then so does the $200 Class C misdemeanor for accidental 30.06 violations.
Chas.
Phil King voted nay, but he supports OC. I am sure he will do everything he can to get OC moving in conference. In spite of his vote today, he is in the "us" camp. I think we should hold public anger until all is said and done. This thing is so close, let's don't throw a wrench in the gears. Contacting our reps in anger and threatening to vote for someone else next election probably would cause more harm than good. IMHO.PBR wrote:Well looks like -- Appointed (05/27/2015) Phillips (Chair) | Burns | Geren | King, Phil | Nevárez (2 voted for it 3 against it)
Will be overseeing the committee for the House, when and where can you see who from the Senate will be there and when this committee will get started on this?
That's what the OCT guys did and we know how that turned out.....gljjt wrote:Phil King voted nay, but he supports OC. I am sure he will do everything he can to get OC moving in conference. In spite of his vote today, he is in the "us" camp. I think we should hold public anger until all is said and done. This thing is so close, let's don't throw a wrench in the gears. Contacting our reps in anger and threatening to vote for someone else next election probably would cause more harm than good. IMHO.PBR wrote:Well looks like -- Appointed (05/27/2015) Phillips (Chair) | Burns | Geren | King, Phil | Nevárez (2 voted for it 3 against it)
Will be overseeing the committee for the House, when and where can you see who from the Senate will be there and when this committee will get started on this?
I agree, lets hold our anger until Sunday night.gljjt wrote:Phil King voted nay, but he supports OC. I am sure he will do everything he can to get OC moving in conference. In spite of his vote today, he is in the "us" camp. I think we should hold public anger until all is said and done. This thing is so close, let's don't throw a wrench in the gears. Contacting our reps in anger and threatening to vote for someone else next election probably would cause more harm than good. IMHO.PBR wrote:Well looks like -- Appointed (05/27/2015) Phillips (Chair) | Burns | Geren | King, Phil | Nevárez (2 voted for it 3 against it)
Will be overseeing the committee for the House, when and where can you see who from the Senate will be there and when this committee will get started on this?
It's not me, if that's what you think.Blindref757 wrote:Just spent some time on the OCT facebook page. Jon Jononymous sounds an awful lot like someone here at TexasCHLforum.com...someone who knows the system really well!
been on huffines page tooBlindref757 wrote:Just spent some time on the OCT facebook page. Jon Jononymous sounds an awful lot like someone here at TexasCHLforum.com...someone who knows the system really well!
I hope we have something to cheer about before then Brother!RPBrown wrote:I will hold my theories and statements until it is over. I have been afraid of this for sometime though and have said so here.