Re: Three professors sue UT to keep guns out of their classrooms
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 6:46 am
Any updates on this? It is after the 12th and I haven't seen or heard anything yet.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
I think the longer it sits on the docket without anything being done and concealed carry being allowed on campus with nothing happening, the harder it is going to be for anyone to seriously argue that it is a problem. It would behoove people on the scene, e.g. SCC, to document that various classes held various discussions without any apparent problem. I am suspicious of Judge Yeakel, but given his denial of the temporary injunction because the plaintiffs were unlikely to succeed, I think he is unlikely to grant a permanent one, but if he does no doubt the AG and UT will appeal immediately.Papa_Tiger wrote:Any updates on this? It is after the 12th and I haven't seen or heard anything yet.
How in the world can they charge for it? Aren't these kinds of documents the essence of public domain?TexasTornado wrote:I've searched the Google high and low... only place I've found the documents you must pay for a subscription![]()
I can tell you though that it was filed on 9/12. Document 64 & 65 both appear to be motions to dismiss.
If someone goes to the trouble of uploading a public document and providing the means for you to access it, they can charge for their trouble, e.g. a newspaper website. LexisNexis is full of public domain documents, but they charge for the added-value services of sophisticated searching, storage of the documents, etc. Even if you go directly to the court administrators/clerks, wouldn't surprise me if there is a fee for finding and copying the documents. TANSTAAFL.TexasJohnBoy wrote:How in the world can they charge for it? Aren't these kinds of documents the essence of public domain?TexasTornado wrote:I've searched the Google high and low... only place I've found the documents you must pay for a subscription![]()
I can tell you though that it was filed on 9/12. Document 64 & 65 both appear to be motions to dismiss.
My bet would be on the "honorable" opposition. Seems very suspicious that one professor found two of the casings. On a side note what does a "rhetoric professor" teach?Papa_Tiger wrote:More fodder for the lawsuit:
http://highered.blog.statesman.com/2016 ... d-for-him/
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/lo ... m-referral
I wonder who it was who placed the casings? Someone for campus carry or someone opposed trying to fan the flames of dissent?
bblhd672 wrote:My bet would be on the "honorable" opposition. Seems very suspicious that one professor found two of the casings. On a side note what does a "rhetoric professor" teach?Papa_Tiger wrote:More fodder for the lawsuit:
http://highered.blog.statesman.com/2016 ... d-for-him/
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/lo ... m-referral
I wonder who it was who placed the casings? Someone for campus carry or someone opposed trying to fan the flames of dissent?
As far as the liberal activist and the singer/songwriter - I'm glad they cancelled. The less liberals on campus indoctrinating instead of educating the better.
It is interesting to note which courts charge and which do not for court-filed documents. The Texas Supreme Court, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and Texas Appellate Courts do not charge for their opinions or filed briefs to my knowledge. They are freely accessible on-line. Same with the United States Supreme Court. Trial courts appear to be another animal--most appear to charge whether at the federal or state level. Would be nice if none of the courts charged so retired dudes like me on a fixed income can access various documents and study them.JALLEN wrote:There is a system maintained by the Federal courts for access to all court filed documents, called PACR. You register, give a deposit and they bill monthly. Less than $10 a month, no charge. It gives access to all Federal courts. IIRC, it's 10 cents a page to download. I used to use it all the time before I retired.
I would not be surprised to find the casings were planted by an anti. Common tactic by the left on campuses across the use -- spraypaint racial insults on your own door, then call the cops and facebook and complain about 'racism' on campus.bblhd672 wrote: ...
My bet would be on the "honorable" opposition. Seems very suspicious that one professor found two of the casings. On a side note what does a "rhetoric professor" teach?
.
Jusme wrote:bblhd672 wrote:My bet would be on the "honorable" opposition. Seems very suspicious that one professor found two of the casings. On a side note what does a "rhetoric professor" teach?Papa_Tiger wrote:More fodder for the lawsuit:
http://highered.blog.statesman.com/2016 ... d-for-him/
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/lo ... m-referral
I wonder who it was who placed the casings? Someone for campus carry or someone opposed trying to fan the flames of dissent?
As far as the liberal activist and the singer/songwriter - I'm glad they cancelled. The less liberals on campus indoctrinating instead of educating the better.
![]()
One "Rhetoric" professor finds 2 shell casings? She must really have an eye for those things!