The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Can you imagine the cost of the legal fees for the POTUS??? Probably a 1/2 dozen lawyers over the course of 18 months at what? $1000/hr?philip964 wrote: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:16 am California judge dismisses Stormy Daniels lawsuit against Donald Trump and requires her to pay his legal fees.
Technically wouldn't Stormy have to pay for the lawyers fees?flechero wrote: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:56 amCan you imagine the cost of the legal fees for the POTUS??? Probably a 1/2 dozen lawyers over the course of 18 months at what? $1000/hr?philip964 wrote: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:16 am California judge dismisses Stormy Daniels lawsuit against Donald Trump and requires her to pay his legal fees.
I hope Trump tries to cash the check and it bounces and then he charges avanoti a $25 returned check fee, announced via twitter!
Or better yet, avinoti can't pay it and Trump allows him to work it off as representing people in traffic court for $50/hr. and only credits him for the cases he wins.
rotor wrote: Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:39 pmTechnically wouldn't Stormy have to pay for the lawyers fees?flechero wrote: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:56 amCan you imagine the cost of the legal fees for the POTUS??? Probably a 1/2 dozen lawyers over the course of 18 months at what? $1000/hr?philip964 wrote: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:16 am California judge dismisses Stormy Daniels lawsuit against Donald Trump and requires her to pay his legal fees.
I hope Trump tries to cash the check and it bounces and then he charges avanoti a $25 returned check fee, announced via twitter!
Or better yet, avinoti can't pay it and Trump allows him to work it off as representing people in traffic court for $50/hr. and only credits him for the cases he wins.
Only negative for the those who can't accept an ounce of criticism of trump. The article refers to a massively unpopular, scandal-plagued president whose aides are being convicted of serious federal felonies. Unfortunately, that's a true statement. The rest of the article tracks world trends over a period of decades... the only thing negative for trump about that is that there is no way for trump to claim credit for the long trends without an obvious lie. But take heart, that's never stopped trump for claiming credit in the face of facts before.philip964 wrote: Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:31 am https://www.vox.com/2014/11/24/7272929/ ... -good-news
A negative article on Donald Trump (massively unpopular) by Vox that somehow makes the point that the world is winning.
Research the facts and it can be shown that under trump the US has increased our drone strikes and military operations with less accountability than previously. Less talk than previously, but no reduction.philip964 wrote: Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:31 am Anyone notice that we are really not at war vs the previous continuous at war President.
This myth based on half truths and bad science has been debunked so many times it's hard to believe it is still being repeated.philip964 wrote: Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:31 am No one credits global warming or increased levels of CO2 for the increase in food production world wide.
This one I can agree with, if we include the increase of states issuing concealed licenses, stand your ground laws, etc.philip964 wrote: Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:31 am No one credits the increase in gun ownership in America for the reduction in crime.