TexasCHLforum.com

flintknapper wrote:
And you can just call me "flint", its shorter...and everyone else does.

I prefer Flintock the Mighty, myself...

flintknapper wrote:There is always some goofball that can't perform the simplest of tasks. These folks are as much a danger at the range as anywhere else.

I'd rather have them "plug" themselves at home...then send them out into public.

And you can just call me "flint", its shorter...and everyone else does.

Okay, flint, you got it.

I certainly agree that careless folks are a danger on the range, too, but there's often some level of supervision or "peer review" (the alarmed guy in the next lane) that at least provides a chance of catching major errors before they result in disaster.

The bottom line is that Jeff Cooper was right - there's no such thing as a foolproof gun, and his solution is hard to beat: "Fools should keep their hands off machinery."

Excaliber wrote:

flintknapper wrote:There is always some goofball that can't perform the simplest of tasks. These folks are as much a danger at the range as anywhere else.

I'd rather have them "plug" themselves at home...then send them out into public.

And you can just call me "flint", its shorter...and everyone else does.

Okay, flint, you got it.

I certainly agree that careless folks are a danger on the range, too, but there's often some level of supervision or "peer review" (the alarmed guy in the next lane) that at least provides a chance of catching major errors before they result in disaster.

The bottom line is that Jeff Cooper was right - there's no such thing as a foolproof gun, and his solution is hard to beat: "Fools should keep their hands off machinery."

Yup,

You can try to make things "Monkey Proof", but it seems they just keep coming up with "Better Monkeys".

Excaliber wrote:

Wildscar wrote:How about we just use our heads and assume a gun is always loaded and will fire when ever the trigger is pulled and there will be no room for accidents. Thats the best way to answer these questions.

If you have not read the 4 rules then please go read them.
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... =23&t=1801

Whether or not the pistol will fire without a magazine can be a critical piece of knowledge during an encounter that requires a reload. One should know if his weapon is entirely out of action during the reloading process, or if it could still be fired if needed.

Everyone should know with absolute certainty how their weapon will function under these conditions.

Ok well there is that. How about read the owners manual then. Does that work better?

Wildscar wrote: Ok well there is that. How about read the owners manual then. Does that work better?

Huh!! What owners manual

roff wrote:so if my gun doesnt have a magazine disconnect
and i put a fully loaded magazine in cock the gun
release the magazine and theres a round chambered
then the gun wont shoot?

Exactly opposite: if it doesn't have a disconnect, then it will shoot with no magazine.

Liberty wrote:

Wildscar wrote: Ok well there is that. How about read the owners manual then. Does that work better?

Huh!! What owners manual

If one didn't come with the gun (perhaps purchased used without the original materials), the manuals for most modern arms are readily available for download online at the manufacturers' web sites.

I guess I don’t have a Magazine Disconnect.

I removed the extended magazine from my Para, and sure enough.... it fired!

flintknapper wrote:I guess I don’t have a Magazine Disconnect.

I removed the extended magazine from my Para, and sure enough.... it fired!

(Sigh!)

There's one in every crowd.........

On the bright side, at least we can see that flint used a quality magazine!