Re: Not happy with the downtown Austin Hilton
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:33 pm
tag for answer
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
seamusTX wrote:1. If you open-carry based on the traveling exception, you will probably be charged with failure to conceal by a CHL holder. The CHL law has never been reconciled with pre-existing law.
If you try it, let us know how it works out.![]()
2. Routine commuting is not traveling, even if you cross multiple county lines. That's based on case law (I don't have citation).
- Jim
And I think this should cover your hotel room.JJVP wrote: (a2) For purposes of this section, "premisesn includes real property
and a recreational vehicle that is being used as living quarters, regardless
of whether that use is temporary or permanent.
The old Travelling law still exist, The Motorist protection act is something different.JJVP wrote:
What traveling exception is everyone talking about. There is not "traveling exception" any more. You can carry in your car without a license as long as it is concealed, even if you are just driving from your house to the mail box across the street. You cannot OC. It has to be concealed. Am I missing something?
I would think that it is not binding. What you have is two signs, and neither sign contains the words in both languages as required. Then again, if the letters are affixed directly to the glass, one could argue that the entire pane of glass constitutes a single sign. It's a stretch, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't try.TxCommish wrote:Also, I noticed the recent post by Pucker with the photo of a similar sign. This is exactly what they looked like. Veeeery hard to see. Also, here's a question for y'all. There were actually two signs. One on the window to the left of the door, another on the window to the right of the door. The one on the left was a correctly worded, sized, etc. sign in English. The sign in the right window was a correctly worded, sized, etc. sign (I assume) in Spanish. So, my question. Since the sign on the left window in English does not also contain Spanish wording on the same sign, is it a legal 30.06?
Nope. It was two separate pieces of glass. BTW, to update y'all, as of right now 11:29 pm on Friday night, not a squeak from anyone at the Austin Hilton or Hilton Corporate. As Gomer used to say, surprise, surprise!!TrueFlog wrote:I would think that it is not binding. What you have is two signs, and neither sign contains the words in both languages as required. Then again, if the letters are affixed directly to the glass, one could argue that the entire pane of glass constitutes a single sign. It's a stretch, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't try.TxCommish wrote:Also, I noticed the recent post by Pucker with the photo of a similar sign. This is exactly what they looked like. Veeeery hard to see. Also, here's a question for y'all. There were actually two signs. One on the window to the left of the door, another on the window to the right of the door. The one on the left was a correctly worded, sized, etc. sign in English. The sign in the right window was a correctly worded, sized, etc. sign (I assume) in Spanish. So, my question. Since the sign on the left window in English does not also contain Spanish wording on the same sign, is it a legal 30.06?
The old Travelling law ever still exist. It is Texas PC 46.15 (b) (3).Liberty wrote:The old Travelling law never still exist, The Motorist protection act is something different.JJVP wrote:
What traveling exception is everyone talking about. There is not "traveling exception" any more. You can carry in your car without a license as long as it is concealed, even if you are just driving from your house to the mail box across the street. You cannot OC. It has to be concealed. Am I missing something?
Thanks I don't know how that "never" got in there or how I missed seeing it ...ScottDLS wrote:The old Travelling law ever still exist. It is Texas PC 46.15 (b) (3).Liberty wrote:The old Travelling law never still exist, The Motorist protection act is something different.JJVP wrote:
What traveling exception is everyone talking about. There is not "traveling exception" any more. You can carry in your car without a license as long as it is concealed, even if you are just driving from your house to the mail box across the street. You cannot OC. It has to be concealed. Am I missing something?
Liberty -Liberty wrote:ScottDLS wrote:Liberty wrote:JJVP wrote: Thanks I don't know how that "never" got in there or how I missed seeing it ...
I was pleased you noted it, so there wouldn't be confusion. Thanks !!!ScottDLS wrote:Liberty -Liberty wrote:ScottDLS wrote:Liberty wrote:JJVP wrote: Thanks I don't know how that "never" got in there or how I missed seeing it ...
Hope you didn't take offense to my silly requote. Weak attempt at humor. I see you edited your post.
One of the reasons people miss these exceptions is that they are all the way in PC46.15, where as the prohibitions are in PC 46.02 and 03.
-Scott
not in TexasXtremeDuty.45 wrote: can I OC in my vehicle?
Thanks!