Re: Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:06 pm
You can't have it both ways. If they're not going to do bad things, they don't need immunity.Bullitt wrote:This is much ado about nothing.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
You can't have it both ways. If they're not going to do bad things, they don't need immunity.Bullitt wrote:This is much ado about nothing.
It is real. I can forward it to you, if you like.TheArmedFarmer wrote:Wait a minute, did that really come from John Cornyn's office??? Or did you create it as satire?suthdj wrote:Here is the response I got today.
I believe you. I've just never heard anybody refer to the U.S. as a "nation-state" and that set off an alarm in my head, I guess.suthdj wrote:It is real. I can forward it to you, if you like.
The words "nation state" distinguish between "nations" such as a people group (Cherokee Nation, for instance), and "nations" such as a sovereign national entity with borders, citizens, a national government, a military, and full diplomatic recognition.TheArmedFarmer wrote:I believe you. I've just never heard anybody refer to the U.S. as a "nation-state" and that set off an alarm in my head, I guess.suthdj wrote:It is real. I can forward it to you, if you like.
The Annoyed Man wrote:The words "nation state" distinguish between...