Beginning the break-in process for new gun

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
USA1
Senior Member
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Beginning the break-in process for new gun

Post by USA1 »

AndyC wrote:Well, you can buy 8-round conversion kits - I haven't had any problems running 8-rounders in my RIA 1911 (or any of my previous 1911s, for that matter) - but some folks prefer the 7-rounders as they feel they're more reliable. Whatever works for you ;-)
I bought a couple of these...

Image

They hold 8 rounds and fit flush if you don't use the optional bumper thingys.
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
7075-T7
Senior Member
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Little Elm

Re: Beginning the break-in process for new gun

Post by 7075-T7 »

AndyC wrote:Well, remember that springs work in both directions.

A standard 5" 1911 (in .45acp) has a recoil-spring weight of 16 lbs (by JMB's design). Some folks buy a heavier spring eg 18 or 20 lbs to reduce possible frame battering when the slide comes back - but then don't realise that the heavier spring will cause the slide to travel forward again faster than normal, and might outstrip the ability of the magazine to feed a round upwards in time.

It's all a balancing-act.
Good point. As always, test your CC in it's current config before carrying.

I think another issue with the kimber spring is it's too darn short, so when the slide is .25" away from battery the spring pressure is almost nonexistent.

Plus, if everything worked out of the box every time, then we would have nothing to complain about, and what fun would that be :smilelol5:
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Beginning the break-in process for new gun

Post by WildBill »

7075-T7 wrote:
AndyC wrote:Well, remember that springs work in both directions.

A standard 5" 1911 (in .45acp) has a recoil-spring weight of 16 lbs (by JMB's design). Some folks buy a heavier spring eg 18 or 20 lbs to reduce possible frame battering when the slide comes back - but then don't realise that the heavier spring will cause the slide to travel forward again faster than normal, and might outstrip the ability of the magazine to feed a round upwards in time.

It's all a balancing-act.
I think another issue with the kimber spring is it's too darn short, so when the slide is .25" away from battery the spring pressure is almost nonexistent.
That sounds like it could be a real problem.
NRA Endowment Member
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”