Page 3 of 4
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:30 am
by 7075-T7
The Annoyed Man wrote:My M&P340 weighs a VAST 13.3 oz due to it's stainless cylinder.
And it doesn't drag my pants down either. I paid $789 for mine. Yes, that is more than $440-$500, but I also think that, for the most part, you get what you paid for.
Well, it's 1.9oz heavier, so if you carried it every day for 5 years, that's an extra 216.719lbs you're toting around, or more accurately, it's 216.719 lbs I'm
not toting around

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:20 am
by pedalman
Taurus 85 Ultralite with 38Spl +P. Not as prestigious as S&W, but it does well enough for me.
Oh, and don't forget a good pocket holster to go with it.
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:46 am
by The Annoyed Man
7075-T7 wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:My M&P340 weighs a VAST 13.3 oz due to it's stainless cylinder.
And it doesn't drag my pants down either. I paid $789 for mine. Yes, that is more than $440-$500, but I also think that, for the most part, you get what you paid for.
Well, it's 1.9oz heavier, so if you carried it every day for 5 years, that's an extra 216.719lbs you're toting around, or more accurately, it's 216.719 lbs I'm
not toting around

Gad zukes and little fishes! I never thought of it that way before. This gun is going to
cripple me!

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:51 pm
by phrogg
Man, this has been a great thread! Now I'm really looking at that LCR 5450 in .357 Magnum. I gotta get to the gun show this weekend and try to put my hands on some and see how they feel and then do a few trigger pulls as well. Sounds like the trigger pull is potentially pretty different between some of these. I need to make sure I find something nice and light on the trigger too.
Thanks for all the great advice!
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:23 pm
by Mastodon
I pocket a S&W 442. It's excellent for its role in my arsenal. It is almost always nearby, no matter what else I may be carrying.
Reliable....yes.
And hell, I like firing the thing at the range. Some hogue bantam grips, and its a lotta danged fun.
Good question. I just couldn't conceive of pocketing a Semi-auto .380. I held a few at some shops along the way... and no sir, not me. And folks, that is just me.
That j-frame revolver is peace-of-mind in the barest of circumstances.

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:42 pm
by doc540
Colt Cobra

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:55 pm
by Droshi
Not sure I understand the recommendations for .22LR revolvers. I guess they are small, but at the end of the day, are they smaller and more easy to pocket than say a P3AT or LCP?
To me pocket revolver means you need something in the pocket that is big bore. Then again Kahr makes a PM45 that's pretty small...
If I go pocket carry, I'd be likely to get a small .380, but I can see how people wouldn't mind adding a bit more weight (and thickness only at the cylinder) to carry .357 mag or larger.
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:48 am
by PUCKER
couzin wrote:I looked at the S&W Bodyguard. The cylinder release I could get used to I guess since it sorta falls where the trigger once was. I did not like the laser on/off/pulse button location on top of the gun - you have to think about where it is and turn it on, then select the mode.
I actually like the ambidextrous cylinder release, for me it's very easy to use, maybe it's because I'm not in the habit of handling a traditional revolver frequently. Also, on the laser, a quick tap with my thumb on the button and the laser is on, quick and easy for me.

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:51 pm
by chasfm11
Droshi wrote: I'd be likely to get a small .380, but I can see how people wouldn't mind adding a bit more weight (and thickness only at the cylinder) to carry .357 mag or larger.
I was at Bass Pro this evening, trying to build some skill with my new LCP. After only about 30 rounds (it was at the end of a longer shooting session with other guns), I can see that it isn't going to be my favorite but I actually was more accurate with it than I expected, even when I increased the distance. My concern wasn't adding more weight but being afraid that the recoil of a .357 in the smaller gun would be so painful that I won't shoot it as much as I need to. At the end of the day, I think shot placement is at the top of the list and I know that I cannot do that without practice - lots of practice.
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:54 pm
by RPB
My only revolver, a Taurus 5 shot .357 Stainless snubby, is too clunky for pocket carry, so I pocket carry my PT709 Slim. SA, 8 rounds, with double strike capability.
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:18 am
by Greybeard
I have several J-frames, of which the 340 is my favorite for carry. But, if I was in the market for a 5-holer these days and could only own one, it would be the Ruger LCR in 38+P. The lightweight 5-holers in .357 can be quite painful (or on the threshold of) and take longer to get back on target after lighting off just about any .357 load.
FWIW, some 2007 chronograph results of carry ammo out of 340:
125 g. Gold Dot .357: 1,124 fps avg.
135 g. Gold Dot .38+P: 824 fps avg.
Plus a few more from earlier this year:
Ammo: Speer Gold Dot 135 grain (short barrel: product #23921) 38+P out of Ruger LCR: 818 fps. Same ammo out of S&W 340: 816 fps
Ammo: Hornady 110 Grain 38+P Critical Defense. Ruger LCR: 907 fps S&W 340: 889 fps
Ammo: Corbon 125 grain DPX .357 Mag. from S&W 340: 1,049 fps
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:13 am
by PUCKER
AndyC wrote:I don't mean to preach, but I sure hope you guys are putting in the hours at the range with those snubbies. Just like folks relying on the smaller caliber weapons, you'd do well to be more than just sort-kinda proficient in its use if it's carried as your primary.
With that being said, it's time for me to hit the range again....here's a thought - how about a "TX CHL Snubby Range Day" in the not too distant future? It would definitely be an enlightening experience and great for folks to test out the different options.

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:17 am
by chasfm11
PUCKER wrote:AndyC wrote:I don't mean to preach, but I sure hope you guys are putting in the hours at the range with those snubbies. Just like folks relying on the smaller caliber weapons, you'd do well to be more than just sort-kinda proficient in its use if it's carried as your primary.
With that being said, it's time for me to hit the range again....here's a thought - how about a "TX CHL Snubby Range Day" in the not too distant future? It would definitely be an enlightening experience and great for folks to test out the different options.

If my LCP counts as a snubby, I'm in.
Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:10 am
by lws380
442 works fine for me either in a pocket or IWB. For pocket carry, loose fitting pockets/pants work well. If you wear tight or form fitting pants, pocket carry is likely to not work very well for a snubby IMO. Cargo pants are great for pocket carrying a snubby. And my public service statement is to please don't stick a snubby in your pocket without it being in some kind of holster that covers the trigger. Its easy to just drop it in the pocket without a holster, but IMO your chances of a ND increases drastically. Be safe!
