Page 3 of 3

Re: CHL LIABILITY- SHOULD I ACT OR LET IT BE?

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:23 am
by Oldgringo
apostate wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:It is generally considered poor form to Necropost a three year old thread when you are new to a forum.
It appears he joined a few months before the thread began. Perhaps he's an extremely slow typist.
I think he's from Ohio?

Re: CHL LIABILITY- SHOULD I ACT OR LET IT BE?

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:39 am
by TomsTXCHL
Geez a bump of an ancient thread. Some boards have warnings built-in, or otherwise deny bumps > a year old.

OK I'll bite: didn't some state recently introduce legislation that would require Family & Friend interviews as part of the gun-acquisition and/or CHL process? An astonishingly bad idea, as everyone has "family & friends" who are psychos and could derail your application.

Re: CHL LIABILITY- SHOULD I ACT OR LET IT BE?

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:29 am
by jimlongley
RoyGBiv wrote:
snatchel wrote:You would think common sense dictates most folks, and you would be mistaken. Ignorance and stupidity...ugh
"Common Sense" is an oxymoron...

And I believe Hanlon's Razor applies here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Man, and for all these decades I thought that was just a corollary of Murphy's Law.

Re: CHL LIABILITY- SHOULD I ACT OR LET IT BE?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:59 am
by TexasGal
At least I'm not the only person who ever resurrected a moth-eaten thread as a newbie :biggrinjester:
You just get so interested in reading all the old posts. Either that or we need to do something about how boring the new ones are :evil2:

Re: CHL LIABILITY- SHOULD I ACT OR LET IT BE?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:43 pm
by bayouhazard
There will be an answer. Let it be.