TexasCHLforum.com

UpTheIrons wrote:This is almost as exciting as watching a Navy SEAL raid.

Almost .... as long as everyone sticks with us

RPB wrote:11 is hospitals ... connected to campuses in San Antonio physically connected to medical school exempts ONLY the Medical school THERE because it's 1 building almost ONLY THAT school, ONLY that building not the dental school just the medical/hospital

(I'd go for that if it deterimes the vote )


He was going to accept it BUT Wentworth says DOCTORS AT THAT HOSPITAL WANT TO CARRY WHO E-MAILED HIM so moves to table

Wow! Proof that letters were read and made a difference in the vote.

UpTheIrons wrote:This is almost as exciting as watching a Navy SEAL raid.

Only if all forms of "opt-out" amendments suffer same fate as bin Laden

West asking about 21 year olds n up and sitting down

Amendment by Lucio 13 ... Exempts campuses with primary/secondary school so it doesn't conflict with FEDERAL GFSZ (BUT Federal GFSZ Exempts CHLS)

Lucio obviously didn't read my letter.

Jasonw560 wrote:Lucio obviously didn't read my letter.

Nor did Lucio read the Gun Free School Zone Act which exempts CHLs
Wentworth moves to table 13

13 Tabled
20 ayes

RPB wrote:West asking about 21 year olds n up and sitting down

Amendment by Lucio 13 ... Exempts campuses with primary/secondary school so it doesn't conflict with FEDERAL GFSZ (Exempts CHLS)

THERE IS NO CONFLICT! If state law says you can but Fed law says you can't, then you can't! Under state law you could carry in post office (government building, no court or meeting, no 30.06) but Fed law says you can't so you can't. How difficult is that for a STATE SENATOR to understand?

Wentworth states you can't go in the elementary school building on the college campus with the Amendment 8/SB 354 already .... but don't amend to exempt entire campus because a low grade school is somewhere on the property

Those same Elementary kids go to malls where CHLs are .... no difference

austinrealtor wrote:

UpTheIrons wrote:This is almost as exciting as watching a Navy SEAL raid.

Only if all forms of "opt-out" amendments suffer same fate as bin Laden

Right. So far, so good. 19-20 votes against the amendments so far.

Boy, we need to send Sen Wentworth a big thank-you note for slogging through this mess.

I'm almost glad I haven't been able to watch this - what a parade of dunces.

NOW Amendment 14 by Ellis

RE: INSURANCE

State Reimburses colleges for any higher premiums DUE TO CHLS being on campus

Wentworth says RISK not increased, UTAH etc no higher premiums ok I'm fine with that

ACCEPTED by Wentworth 14

RPB wrote:NOW Amendment 14 by Ellis

RE: INSURANCE

State Reimburses colleges for any higher premiums DUE TO CHLS being on campus

Wentworth says RISK not increased, UTAH etc no higher premiums ok I'm fine with that

ACCEPTED by Wentworth 14

WOW... so does that mean they'll actually vote on SB 5 with the amendment now???

are these senators (Ellis for 1) REALLY this STUPID ...
If I was not already bald, I would be..

SB 354 or Amenment 8 or whatever it is now ONLY specifically excludes colleges/universities from 46.03, right? So carrying in a K-12 school is still illegal under PC 46.03 even if this bill passes, right? So carrying in a K-12 school even if it is using a college building will still be illegal, right?

Can someone PLEASE tell Lucio this so he'll shut up.