Re: NRA Petition to fire Holder
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:20 pm
Me three.The Annoyed Man wrote:Me too.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Me three.The Annoyed Man wrote:Me too.
Sorry. I'm done. Just couldn't let a clearly false statement purportedly grounded in fact to go without comment. Back to your regularly scheduled thread.AEA wrote:![]()
Mother doesn't report missing child for 30 daysloadedliberal wrote:To me it was a non-issue, a couple of yoohoos standing outside a polling place holding a baton, ok they "looked' scary but have you heard a single voter complaint, neither did the DOJ there was not a single person who said they felt intimidated so how can you convict someone of voter intimidation when no-one was intimidated? And thre reason the Bush DOJ downgraded it to a civil case was there was not enough evidence for a criminal case. So my take on it is there was not enough for a civil case either since there was no complaining witness. Here is another link. http://mediamatters.org/research/201007070020" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
My point was for there to be voter intimidation a voter has to be intimidated, and none came forward. Unlike the 2006 case where Arizona Minutemen were accosting hispanic voters and no charges came. And on a side note the Jury in the Anthony case made the right choice, the prosecution did not come close to proving their case.Blindref757 wrote:Mother doesn't report missing child for 30 daysloadedliberal wrote:To me it was a non-issue, a couple of yoohoos standing outside a polling place holding a baton, ok they "looked' scary but have you heard a single voter complaint, neither did the DOJ there was not a single person who said they felt intimidated so how can you convict someone of voter intimidation when no-one was intimidated? And thre reason the Bush DOJ downgraded it to a civil case was there was not enough evidence for a criminal case. So my take on it is there was not enough for a civil case either since there was no complaining witness. Here is another link. http://mediamatters.org/research/201007070020" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Searches for chloroform on the computer
Chloroform found in the trunk
Stench of death coming from the trunk
Mom out partying like a rock star
Rare duct tape found on everything in the home and on the body
How can you convict if there was no good evidence? No witnesses?
Excaliber wrote:Resisting evil is never easy, but it is also never a waste of time.Blindref757 wrote:Waste of time! He isn't going to be fired. If he didn't get fired over the ACORN/Black Panthers deal, he's not going to get fired over anything.
Declaring the battle lost before it is joined only lets it grow stronger until it must be confronted or it destroys you later.
Being vanquished by evil is bad, to be vanquished by yourself is much worse.
Pick your battles and pick your time, but never give in to evil.
Oldgringo wrote:The guy who hired him should also be fired!
Blindref757 wrote:I've pretty much given up on most things political after years of frustration. The elected class does not listen. Party affilliation makes no difference...they are out of touch and the damage they've done at this point likely can't be undone. I vote in every election from city dog catcher to president...and I continually find myself choosing between the lessor of two evils. The whole process stinks and is pretty much hopeless.