TexasCHLforum.com

Thank you. Nearly every time someone here wants to drive home a point by citing a 'learned publication', it turns out to be some on-line tripe with some reactionary viewpoint. If that is all you ever read, then you begin to believe it and assume everyone else believes it as well. If it's in the Wall Street Journal, it's usually pretty accurate.

Beiruty wrote:Until the interests of US citizens is 1st priority over NON-Citizens living outside the boundaries of USA, US will still be sliding in the Abyss. This is the true honest to God theory.

I would amend this by saying until the interests of US citizens is first priority over non-citizens, whether inside or outside the boundaries of the USA, the US will still slide into the abyss.

Still, you pretty much summed up the problem in a nutshell. The ONLY priority of the US government should be to US citizens.

Kythas wrote:

Beiruty wrote:Until the interests of US citizens is 1st priority over NON-Citizens living outside the boundaries of USA, US will still be sliding in the Abyss. This is the true honest to God theory.

I would amend this by saying until the interests of US citizens is first priority over non-citizens, whether inside or outside the boundaries of the USA, the US will still slide into the abyss.

Still, you pretty much summed up the problem in a nutshell. The ONLY priority of the US government should be to US citizens.

Wow. You guys kind of sound like y'all might want a government bound by the Constitution. What it authorizes the branches
to do, contraints etc. Not the multi directions gov has taken. Two words come immediately to mind: Ron Paul.
News media dismiss him, no coverage what-so-ever. Well, he's continuing to p/u delegates. Smoked Romney in Az & Mn.
Also took Iowa, Miz and Ma. and a couple more..... but, he doesn't stand a chance ..... maybe not, maybe. This
convention could be really interesting.

Heartland Patriot wrote:SNIP

drjoker wrote:It seems to me like the presidential race against Obama is a lost cause. I don't think Romney has a chance against big O.

I simply do not believe what you stated there to be true. I think that Mitt Romney has a great chance to win this thing and restore some sense of normalcy to our nation. However, with folks spreading that attitude you displayed, it certainly makes it much harder for him to win.

Sorry. You're right. I should be more optimistic.

I still don't have my answer. Which pro 2a candidate in a narrowly contested senate race do you suggest I should donate $ to? Thanks.

drjoker wrote:

Heartland Patriot wrote:SNIP

drjoker wrote:It seems to me like the presidential race against Obama is a lost cause. I don't think Romney has a chance against big O.

I simply do not believe what you stated there to be true. I think that Mitt Romney has a great chance to win this thing and restore some sense of normalcy to our nation. However, with folks spreading that attitude you displayed, it certainly makes it much harder for him to win.

Sorry. You're right. I should be more optimistic.

I still don't have my answer. Which pro 2a candidate in a narrowly contested senate race do you suggest I should donate $ to? Thanks.

I wish I had a solid answer for you but at the present I just don't. I've been very busy trying to finish my technical program at college. I'm really close to the end now. I haven't even made up my mind between Leppert, Cruz and Dewhurst...what I want to know is how each of them feels about campus carry...because even though I may not be going to college anymore doesn't mean I don't still care. I DO know that there is one man in this state who had a serious negative effect on campus carry losing...and IIRC, Texas A&M is in his district. So, I'm going to look him up and see if HE has a primary challenger and donate money there...I'm telling you folks, that leftist hyped bull that got campus carry defeated really ticked me off.

What the MSM is not telling you is Ron Paul is winning multiple states and will be on the ballot come Tampa, and if you want true change, you should be standing with him!

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/

By the way he just won Virginia, Oklahoma, and Arizona!

GeekDad wrote:What the MSM is not telling you is Ron Paul is winning multiple states and will be on the ballot come Tampa, and if you want true change, you should be standing with him!

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/

By the way he just won Virginia, Oklahoma, and Arizona!

I actually read about that and saw it on cnn. Have I missed the bandwagon? I have tried to join the rep party as a card carrying member but their website is confusing. How do I join to participate in the primary? Romney has been shunning tea partiers but if ron paul can throw a monkey wrench in his campaign, he'll have to acknowledge us because ro paul will be able to negotiate concessions for him in return for ron paul's endorsement to ensure uninterrupted momentum.

drjoker wrote:

GeekDad wrote:What the MSM is not telling you is Ron Paul is winning multiple states and will be on the ballot come Tampa, and if you want true change, you should be standing with him!

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/

By the way he just won Virginia, Oklahoma, and Arizona!

I actually read about that and saw it on cnn. Have I missed the bandwagon? I have tried to join the rep party as a card carrying member but their website is confusing. How do I join to participate in the primary? Romney has been shunning tea partiers but if ron paul can throw a monkey wrench in his campaign, he'll have to acknowledge us because ro paul will be able to negotiate concessions for him in return for ron paul's endorsement to ensure uninterrupted momentum.

Ron Paul will not endorse Romney... I can pretty much guarantee that. Ron Paul has never been bought for 30+ years... I don't think he will start now.

And many RP supports such as myself will be voting RP no matter what.


To Join
http://www.texasgop.org/join