The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
You're not the quickest draw on this forum, are you? Spam is unwanted commercial solicitations, and I'm just posting an opinion. If you want to engage in a meaningful conversation, then let's have it. That's what I came here for.longhorn_92 wrote:It don't smell like Tuna... more like SPAM.
To us, they matter a great deal!tuna wrote:Why is that? You're saying the dead kids don't matter?Mike1951 wrote:And you need to understand that with first posts like this, YOU have zero credibility here!
Agreed, and they shoulda stayed quiet instead of talking up armed guards, armed teachers, and introducing a new shoot'em game. They're not bolstering their credibility.Topbuilder wrote:I always thought the NRA should have gone to the press conference and stated " I'm not really sure why you asked me here. You have a mental heath issue. This is not one of my areas of expertise." and walked away from the podium...
I can't say I agree with that. Why would they use a tragic incident in that manner? Obama went four years without saying boo before this.Mike1951 wrote:To us, they matter a great deal!tuna wrote:Why is that? You're saying the dead kids don't matter?Mike1951 wrote:And you need to understand that with first posts like this, YOU have zero credibility here!
To Obama and his minions, they are only a means to an end. They had their plans at the ready, waiting for an incident like this to provide the impetus to use them.
Who was your CHL instructor .... That's what this forum is for ...tuna wrote:You're not the quickest draw on this forum, are you? Spam is unwanted commercial solicitations, and I'm just posting an opinion. If you want to engage in a meaningful conversation, then let's have it. That's what I came here for.longhorn_92 wrote:It don't smell like Tuna... more like SPAM.
He waited four years because if he had acted in his first term he wouldn't have been re-elected.tuna wrote:I can't say I agree with that. Why would they use a tragic incident in that manner? Obama went four years without saying boo before this.Mike1951 wrote:To us, they matter a great deal!tuna wrote:Why is that? You're saying the dead kids don't matter?Mike1951 wrote:And you need to understand that with first posts like this, YOU have zero credibility here!
To Obama and his minions, they are only a means to an end. They had their plans at the ready, waiting for an incident like this to provide the impetus to use them.
I don't have one. I'll take a recommendation.RPB wrote: Who was your CHL instructor .... That's what this forum is for ...
Would you like a recommendation on where o take the class?
Because I saw something that I disagreed with and I wanted to post a reply.RPB wrote:Why make your first post in "political" section?
Alright troll, I'll bite.tuna wrote:Why is that? You're saying the dead kids don't matter?Mike1951 wrote:And you need to understand that with first posts like this, YOU have zero credibility here!
YOU came here to push buttons and to look for a "fight". Have a fantastic day. I am done with you.tuna wrote:You're not the quickest draw on this forum, are you? Spam is unwanted commercial solicitations, and I'm just posting an opinion. If you want to engage in a meaningful conversation, then let's have it. That's what I came here for.longhorn_92 wrote:It don't smell like Tuna... more like SPAM.
If he legislates a method of control that reduces the homicide rate, how can that be bad? You're not even willing to let him try.Mike1951 wrote:He waited four years because if he had acted in his first term he wouldn't have been re-elected.
Nothing like the security of being the lamest of ducks.
Not fight, discussion. You went to fight mode, tossing SPAM accusations. Regardless, I just wanted to see how my opinion could be better informed. I don't get the hate and distrust.longhorn_92 wrote:YOU came here to push buttons and to look for a "fight". Have a fantastic day. I am done with you.
More lives would be saved by preventing abortions, yet there is no support for that.tuna wrote:If he legislates a method of control that reduces the homicide rate, how can that be bad? You're not even willing to let him try.Mike1951 wrote:He waited four years because if he had acted in his first term he wouldn't have been re-elected.
Nothing like the security of being the lamest of ducks.
tuna wrote:I don't have one. I'll take a recommendation.RPB wrote: Who was your CHL instructor .... That's what this forum is for ...
Would you like a recommendation on where o take the class?
several are here Class schedules/ locations
viewforum.php?f=6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you don't see one close to you, list what city you are in and one can be recommended
Because I saw something that I disagreed with and I wanted to post a reply.RPB wrote:Why make your first post in "political" section?
Fair answer, Then I'd invite you to read a bit here, educate yourself to form a better, more learned opinion. There are others who used to think as you do prior to learning more, ... (Just one example off the top of my head out of many ...) like Dr. Bill Holda who learned more, got licensed and furthered his education.
tuna wrote:Agreed, and they shoulda stayed quiet instead of talking up armed guards, armed teachers, and introducing a new shoot'em game. They're not bolstering their credibility.Topbuilder wrote:I always thought the NRA should have gone to the press conference and stated " I'm not really sure why you asked me here. You have a mental heath issue. This is not one of my areas of expertise." and walked away from the podium...