Page 3 of 7
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2019 6:29 pm
				by denwego
				The DC Circuit Court has expanded their injunction against enforcement of the ban to all members of the Firearms Policy Foundation - it's worth a buck a month to be a member and fall under the penumbra in case SCOTUS doesn't intervene before midnight! 
Links to the ruling/injunction modification can be found here, along with their donation. 
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2019/ ... n-members/
(PS - I'm not trying to be a shill - I'm just glad to pass along info!)
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 8:16 am
				by crazy2medic
				As of this morning if you are in possession of a bump stock the Govt will prosecute you for having a machinegun, crazy crazy world!
			 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:57 am
				by bblhd672
				crazy2medic wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 8:16 am
As of this morning if you are in possession of a bump stock the Govt will prosecute you for having a machinegun, crazy crazy world!
 
Waiting to hear whether I should get rid of my rubber bands.....
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:05 am
				by DocV
				All of my belt loops were lost in a tragic boating accident.
			 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:28 am
				by crazy2medic
				DocV wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:05 am
All of my belt loops were lost in a tragic boating accident.
 
And you almost drowned and barely survived the accident! Thankfully you only lost your belt loops!
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:29 am
				by eyedoc
				DocV wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:05 am
All of my belt loops were lost in a tragic boating accident.
 
You better switch to pull on boots too since shoelaces are a machine gun.
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:40 pm
				by rotor
				For someone that has not researched this if you own a bumpstock but don't own any firearms do you still own a machine gun?
			 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:21 pm
				by canvasbck
				So, overnight many people I know became felons by doing absolutely nothing.
			 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:29 pm
				by RogueUSMC
				Jason Todd wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:00 pm
mojo84 wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 5:55 pm
Bill Anderson wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 2:19 pm
The Annoyed Man wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:07 pm
Here’s what I 
DO know: law enforcement’s investigation is either a crappy job that leaves more questions than it answers; or it’s a coverup of some kind. The ambiguity is not good for us.
 
Very bad for us when fingering the real culprits is called "bashing" by the 
supporters of anti-constitutional big government.
 
To whom are you referring to as "supporters of anti-constitutional big government"?
 
I'll take "Enemies Foreign and Domestic" for $400 Alex.
 
DINGDINGDING!
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:31 pm
				by Soccerdad1995
				canvasbck wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:21 pm
So, overnight many people I know became felons by doing absolutely nothing.
 
And our current President has just earned the honor of ordering the forfeiture of more guns than any President in the history of our nation.  I did vote for him, and I might do so again, and I'm sure Hillary would have done the same, but facts are facts.
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:12 pm
				by proudpirate
				I lost my rubberbands in boating accident  

 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 3:07 pm
				by mojo84
				RogueUSMC wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:29 pm
Jason Todd wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:00 pm
mojo84 wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 5:55 pm
Bill Anderson wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 2:19 pm
The Annoyed Man wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:07 pm
Here’s what I 
DO know: law enforcement’s investigation is either a crappy job that leaves more questions than it answers; or it’s a coverup of some kind. The ambiguity is not good for us.
 
Very bad for us when fingering the real culprits is called "bashing" by the 
supporters of anti-constitutional big government.
 
To whom are you referring to as "supporters of anti-constitutional big government"?
 
I'll take "Enemies Foreign and Domestic" for $400 Alex.
 
DINGDINGDING!
 
I don't think that is who he was referring to.
 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:00 pm
				by puma guy
				crazy2medic wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 8:16 am
As of this morning if you are in possession of a bump stock the Govt will prosecute you for having a machinegun, crazy crazy world!
 
Does it make Jerry Miculek's trigger finger illegal?  

 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:16 pm
				by NotRPB
				 
 rotor wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:40 pm
For someone that has not researched this 
if you own a bumpstock but don't own any firearms do you still own a machine gun?
 
  
 
hmmm good question
 

 
			
					
				Re: GOA in court re bumpstock-ban - interesting
				Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:50 pm
				by jason812
				rotor wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:40 pm
For someone that has not researched this if you own a bumpstock but don't own any firearms do you still own a machine gun?
 
If you own a full auto sear but no receiver, you own a machine gun.  It's a grey area to own the full auto trigger, selector and disconnect but no sear.  But bumpstock and no rifle is a good question.