TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
If he had said that, then the amendment would have been adopted. Some things are best left unsaid.

Chas.

Really? It looked like to me he provided no reason whatsoever to NOT adopt the amendment. I just figured the only reason it didn't get adopted was that the supporters realize the fewer amendments they tack on, the less likely it will be a problem to get it through the Senate.

TVGuy wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Rep. strickland is going to be one and done.

I certainly hope so!

Chas.

How is that even possible? He's a second term rep. (unfortunately)

Payback??

Tazman wrote:What just happened on that vote?

Author withdrew his objection to amendment. House voted and passed it.

The Wall wrote:This Stickland is mental I think. He's something else that I won't mention here.

It will be interesting to see if OCT continues to hail him as a champion.

Chas.

This guys talking to me.

PaaaaaaLeeeezzzzz

So the amendment to change 30.06 passed, does that by default also change 30.07?

How did the amendment change 30.06?

"We'll be running down the street with our guns and it will be ok". Does he mean like this?

You mean like the great Lone Star State of days of old?

jerry_r60 wrote:So the amendment to change 30.06 passed, does that by default also change 30.07?

The amendment's author only mentioned 30.06, not open carry. So if HB910 passes with this amendment, 30.06 will still apply to CC, but with a somewhat lesser penalty, and no mention of how it applies to OC.

jerry_r60 wrote:So the amendment to change 30.06 passed, does that by default also change 30.07?

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/ ... 10H218.PDF" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Great answer!

Butt chewing in progress....

That amendment makes it look like if they are on the property and are told that a concealed handgun isn't welcome there then they are automatically guilty without being given a chance to leave?