Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:47 am
I fully agree with the above observations as to the wording of the poll question. But given the overwhelming response in our favor, why quibble over technicalities?
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
First of all, it's hardly a technicality, the wording of the question will most probably be used to drive and derive the news article announcing the results, ie:frankie_the_yankee wrote:I fully agree with the above observations as to the wording of the poll question. But given the overwhelming response in our favor, why quibble over technicalities?
jimlongley wrote:First of all, it's hardly a technicality, the wording of the question will most probably be used to drive and derive the news article announcing the results, ie:frankie_the_yankee wrote:I fully agree with the above observations as to the wording of the poll question. But given the overwhelming response in our favor, why quibble over technicalities?
NORTH TEXANS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT CANCELLATION OF CHL LAW (which might actually be true, if only in favor of Vermont Style Carry)
or:
NORTH TEXANS UNCONCERNED ABOUT RAMPANT WEAPONS POSSESSION AT STATE FAIR (which is probably not true)
Fox4's refusal to correct the obviously poor wording of the poll sounds to me like there is an agenda, particularly the response that people might not have known the law existed. Remember that they made a big deal, in their news article, about people being able to carry THIS year, and failed to mention that it has been the law since 2003.
I just can't really see the results as either valid, due to the number of people, if just on this forum, who have hit the site multiple times, or supportive of "our" POV due to the poor wording.
I doubt it. If the poll had showed 90% of the people AGAINST carrying at the Fair, they might have done a story about it. But given the way it ultimately turned out, I think they will just bury it.whohears wrote:agree with jimlongley here.
any interpretation of results from this survey would be invalid--either for or against CHL carry at the fair. but I'm sure someone will use the results to drive an antigun agenda.
frankie_the_yankee wrote:I doubt it. If the poll had showed 90% of the people AGAINST carrying at the Fair, they might have done a story about it. But given the way it ultimately turned out, I think they will just bury it.whohears wrote:agree with jimlongley here.
any interpretation of results from this survey would be invalid--either for or against CHL carry at the fair. but I'm sure someone will use the results to drive an antigun agenda.
Note also that to a committed anti-gun person, there is almost no difference or distinction between someone with a CHL and someone without one. It is people like us who are cognizant of these differences. To the antis, ALL non-LEO gun possession is bad.
And since the poll allowed multiple voting, the results can't really withstand any sort of scrutiny.
So I suspect that, in the words of Lincoln, this poll will be "little noted nor long remembered."
It's main value, as I see it, is simple entertainment. I sure got a few laughs out of it thinking about how the newsroom crew must have reacted to the tally as it came in. I'm sure it was not what they expected.
One has to hope that the poll will not be as "little noted nor long remembered" as the occasion Lincoln wrote those words for.frankie_the_yankee wrote:So I suspect that, in the words of Lincoln, this poll will be "little noted nor long remembered."