Page 4 of 4
Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:20 am
by stevie_d_64
03Lightningrocks wrote:Keith B wrote:Drop the attacks guys.
Play nice or don't play.
LOL...I didn't really think we were getting all that bad.

Politics do get a bit heated ya know. I will take it down a notch though. Sorry bout that. Obama has a way of making me want to kick the dog.
See, that's why I recommended folks to clear all missile hazards, including knives, forks, spoons, pets, plants, Mother-in-laws, Brother-in-laws, wives, kids, fake fireplace logs...etc etc etc...
Stay away from alcohol, and leave the firearms in another room...
It's not the TV's fault!!!

Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:38 am
by TxD
stevie_d_64 wrote:TxD wrote:Obama + SOTU = Balloon juice
I'm not sure what that means...But it certainly reeks of negativity...

It means President Obama's State Of The Union Address is full of hot air.
(The juice inside a balloon.)
A term sometimes used in polite company instead of the more familar expression, Bull...

Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:06 am
by Abraham
I'm a steadfast conservative, but fellow conservatives discredit their argument when they employ puerile name calling.
Of course, name calling can be strongly laxative and maybe that's what's at work...
Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:38 am
by 03Lightningrocks
TxD wrote:stevie_d_64 wrote:TxD wrote:Obama + SOTU = Balloon juice
I'm not sure what that means...But it certainly reeks of negativity...

It means President Obama's State Of The Union Address is full of hot air.
(The juice inside a balloon.)
A term sometimes used in polite company instead of the more familar expression, Bull...

Thanks for clearing that up. i was real close to utilizing a Google search.

Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:41 am
by 03Lightningrocks
Abraham wrote:I'm a steadfast conservative, but fellow conservatives discredit their argument when they employ puerile name calling.
Of course, name calling can be strongly laxative and maybe that's what's at work...
Maybe to you, but to me they show they are just as fed up as I am. Then again I am not a pretentious person, so I don't spend much time trying to figure out how I can look better than someone else on the internet.
Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:20 am
by Abraham
03Lightningrocks,
Now that's more like it!
No hysterical, home grown epithets or neurotic displays of any kind - just good ole sarcasm.
Keep up the good work.
Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:23 am
by 03Lightningrocks
Abraham wrote:03Lightningrocks,
Now that's more like it!
No hysterical, home grown epithets or neurotic displays of any kind - just good ole sarcasm.
Keep up the good work.
Well thank you.

Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:22 pm
by cougartex
USA1 wrote:As much as I can hardly stand to watch the guy , it will be interesting to see if
even after a year in office if the blame will still be put on Bush.
Also , I'm sure that he will boast about "creating or saving jobs" even with the double digit unemployment.
Prepare to be amazed.


Bush will still be blamed in 2012.

Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:26 pm
by marksiwel
cougartex wrote:USA1 wrote:As much as I can hardly stand to watch the guy , it will be interesting to see if
even after a year in office if the blame will still be put on Bush.
Also , I'm sure that he will boast about "creating or saving jobs" even with the double digit unemployment.
Prepare to be amazed.


Bush will still be blamed in 2012.

We will be in Iraq untill 2011
And You bet your boots we will be in Afghanistan way past 2012.

Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:36 pm
by Oldgringo
marksiwel wrote:cougartex wrote:USA1 wrote:As much as I can hardly stand to watch the guy , it will be interesting to see if
even after a year in office if the blame will still be put on Bush.
Also , I'm sure that he will boast about "creating or saving jobs" even with the double digit unemployment.
Prepare to be amazed.


Bush will still be blamed in 2012.

We will be in Iraq untill 2011
And You bet your boots we will be in Afghanistan way past 2012.

I'm not convinced that we should have been in Iraq this time at all, Saddam and those folk weren't hurting anybody except each other - so what's the problem with that?
BTST, I'm equally convinced we should nuke Afghanistan and the surrounding area NOW. Those folk are hurting everybody; especially, Americans.
Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:52 pm
by boomerang
They can blame Bush for going in but Obama had a year to pull out and hasn't.
Re: State of the Union Address
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:01 pm
by marksiwel
boomerang wrote:They can blame Bush for going in but Obama had a year to pull out and hasn't.
Yeah, that wouldnt have backfired...
I'm not happy with who is in the White House, its too late to pull out