TLynnHughes wrote:A huge positive is that it is AMAZINGLY accurate for a small gun. williamkevin and I couldn't stop saying "wow" when we took it to the range.
I suspect that Glocks in general are that way. My wife's G19 is pretty accurate.
TLynnHughes wrote:I had one failure to feed, but I think it was my fault. It happened during the first or second magazine through while I was still getting a feel for it and it's likely that I limp wristed it a bit. Right now, the slide release is REALLY tough, but I'm hoping that will wear a bit and get easier.
They really aren't invincible. If the shooter does something wrong, like the limp-wristing you mentioned, the gun will behave accordingly.
TLynnHughes wrote:The reason I picked the Glock over the Sig is the way it felt. The Sig felt top heavy (or slide heavy) when I held it, while the Glock felt more balanced (of course, I realize that probably has nothing to do with how it shoots, that's just a personal preference.)
Both my wife's Glock and my M&P 45 share this characteristic. The design permits the bore axis to sit very low relative to the rest of the frame, so you have a low slide too. When combined with that "beavertail" at the back of the frame which encourages a high grip on the gun, you really notice how low the reciprocating mass of the slide/barrel assembly is to the frame. That makes these guns fairly easy to shoot. BTW, I found my old USP Compact .40, which I sold to Carlson1, to feel much like a Sig - kind of top-heavy.
TLynnHughes wrote:I'll let williamkevin weigh in with his own opinion, but I will say...and you didn't hear this from me

...he's thinking about trading in his CZ and his M&P 9 on a Glock. I think that's a pretty strong testimony.
I can't speak to the CZ, but I don't think he'll be any happier with the Glock than he has been with his M&P.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT