TexasCHLforum.com

esxmarkc wrote:

Also, can everyone quit dissing on the designer jeans? I just got a pair of True Religion jeans on sale for the bargain price of $150. The wife unit picked them out because she was tired of my Wranglers.

I'd bet at that price they come with colorful handkerchiefs pre-sewn into the pockts

Just don't get one with a brown hanky.

Hoi Polloi wrote: It's a wikipedia article, but it is not safe for work or the more sensitive reader: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handkerchief_code" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

DFWTT wrote:

Hoi Polloi wrote: It's a wikipedia article, but it is not safe for work or the more sensitive reader: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handkerchief_code" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And I thought they were used by gang bangers. Well, technically....

...ignorance is bliss...glad I wasn't up on all that...

Hoi Polloi wrote: It's a wikipedia article, but it is not safe for work or the more sensitive reader: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handkerchief_code" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I just thought gangs of the thug type used bandannas....... Now I know differently.....

Printing is and should always be a concern to the CHL. However, some tend to worry more than necessary. As stated in several of the post, the average person sees little. Stop and ask yourself, how many time have you noticed a stranger printing. I mean actually printing or displaying, not suspecting so. And, we who are aware and know where to look, see little or no evidence of carry. Now I know that some of you have, but I'm willing to bet an honest polling of our group would indicate very few have seen any positive evidence.