While those who are better versed in Utah law may want to comment, it seems like I read somewhere in the past few days that the ghostbusters signs have no more legitimacy there than in Tejas ...
FWIW, an "update" article: http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,12 ... 35,00.html
Gunman Kills 5 in Utah Shopping Mall
Moderator: carlson1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
- Location: Denton County
- Contact:
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
- Roger Howard
- Senior Member
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, TX
Either way on the technical point, I'm not sure about the specifics of posting in Utah. I do know, as reported by NRA News, That mall was properly posted to ban CCW by permit holders.
If guns kill people, then I can blame mispelled words on my pencil
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
I was also involved in another discussion on this and I am no longer sure the sign has any legal meaning. It was pointed out to me that their whole criminal trespass law has a defense in it for any place that is open to the public and your trespass does not interfere with the normal course of buisness, or something similar. That would mean there is no way to ban a CHL at any business that is open to the public.Roger Howard wrote:It's confirmed the mall in question is posted for no CCW just like Katy Mills. A ghostbuster works there. I wonder if any lawsuits against the mall owners will come??
Steve Rothstein
- Roger Howard
- Senior Member
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, TX
I'm not that "up" on Utah law as I don't get there very often anymore. I'm just passing on what was reported by NRA News.srothstein wrote:I was also involved in another discussion on this and I am no longer sure the sign has any legal meaning. It was pointed out to me that their whole criminal trespass law has a defense in it for any place that is open to the public and your trespass does not interfere with the normal course of buisness, or something similar. That would mean there is no way to ban a CHL at any business that is open to the public.Roger Howard wrote:It's confirmed the mall in question is posted for no CCW just like Katy Mills. A ghostbuster works there. I wonder if any lawsuits against the mall owners will come??
If guns kill people, then I can blame mispelled words on my pencil
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
I went looking for a similar forum in Utah, but came across this website
http://www.goutahorg.org/
Look in Alerts #265 on Feb 13. This organization looks like they are trying to keep their RKBA afloat and hitting some hard opposition.
http://www.goutahorg.org/
Look in Alerts #265 on Feb 13. This organization looks like they are trying to keep their RKBA afloat and hitting some hard opposition.