Page 4 of 4

Re: Outback Steakhouse following Starbucks

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:10 pm
by bizarrenormality
Abraham wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzz cough, snore, zzzzzzzz
There's a cure for that.

Re: Outback Steakhouse following Starbucks

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:23 pm
by Stripes Dude
Right2Carry wrote:
What facts have you provided? You have spoken a few words about what you think a few franchises might be doing, but you offered no tangible evidence to support your position. When you can provide something in writing from one of more of those franchises stating that is why they put up those signs, then you will have something factual to substantiate your claim.
Think about what you are suggesting. Why would I "out" trusted colleagues who are bound by business obligations and are not comfortable saying "no" due to the fact that they may lose their livelihood, but also have a strong feeling about our rights?

Clearly you're a "prove it with indisputable evidence or it isn't true" forum member....so this one may be a bit disappointing for you.

Re: Outback Steakhouse following Starbucks

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:37 pm
by Right2Carry
Stripes Dude wrote:
Right2Carry wrote:
What facts have you provided? You have spoken a few words about what you think a few franchises might be doing, but you offered no tangible evidence to support your position. When you can provide something in writing from one of more of those franchises stating that is why they put up those signs, then you will have something factual to substantiate your claim.
Think about what you are suggesting. Why would I "out" trusted colleagues who are bound by business obligations and are not comfortable saying "no" due to the fact that they may lose their livelihood, but also have a strong feeling about our rights?

Clearly you're a "prove it with indisputable evidence or it isn't true" forum member....so this one may be a bit disappointing for you.
That's why they call them FACTS.