Page 32 of 32

Re: Sen. Huffines is killing HB910

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 3:14 pm
by safety1
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
safety1 wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:While it would have been in statute, in the real world and courts, it was little more than a policy statement. It was a good policy statement, but it was also a slap in the face to law enforcement because it was a legislative statement that LEOs are not to be trusted. It doesn't matter if anyone agrees with that or not (I do not), that's how the Dutton amendment has been perceived.

Chas.
So because LEOs as a whole perceived this as a slap in the face, the bill goes down? :confused5
They (LEOs) mainly in the larger cities didn't support HB910 anyway.
Right now I'm mad at everything in the universe, so I'm pretty much out of patience.

With that said, stop putting words in my mouth!!! I pointed out why the Dutton amendment has become a problem; I didn't say that HB910 was dead.

Chas.
Charles, I corrected my "quoting" if I was the person you was referring to.
I didn't feel like I was putting words in your mouth....I was asking a question.
I apologize if it came off that way.