The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Is there time for that??Beiruty wrote:Now, the bill has to go back to the Senate, then Senate would have to strip the amendment and then goes to a conference for a fix.
Probably not.safety1 wrote:Is there time for that??Beiruty wrote:Now, the bill has to go back to the Senate, then Senate would have to strip the amendment and then goes to a conference for a fix.
Can someone briefly explain what this is about?TexasJohnBoy wrote:Point of Order on the entire bill? Wow.
Oh, absolutely. I recognized it as exactly what it was. That's why I brought up the "childish" reference. The comment really had nothing to do with this bill, and was just another ill placed slap. I would hope most folks are above that.jerry_r60 wrote:Surely you can see that there was sarcasm in the cheeseburger comment. You seem to be reacting to it as a literal statement.ScooterSissy wrote:He just spoke, doing his job. Not out for cheeseburgers.K5GU wrote:What comments would you be referring to? I like cheeseburgers too. But I don't act like a child on the Texas House floor.ScooterSissy wrote:Some of you folks really don't seem to like Strickland. The "cheeseburger" comment sounds much like the childishness comments that have been going around.K5GU wrote:I think a member on the floor has to move a "point of order" to enforce the time limit. If they aren't paying attention or have all gone out to join Stickland for a cheeseburger, they won't be able to declare the point of order.TexasJohnBoy wrote:There's no time limits being enforced either. They aren't going to get past amendment 1.
Why?
It's about whether the bill was eligible to be placed on the Major State Calendar. OverruledRuark wrote:Can someone briefly explain what this is about?TexasJohnBoy wrote:Point of Order on the entire bill? Wow.
That at least makes clear what you were after. I'll not defend or attack the sarcasm, I'm not interested in that at this point. I did answer your question about why some of us are not fans of Stickland.ScooterSissy wrote:Oh, absolutely. I recognized it as exactly what it was. That's why I brought up the "childish" reference. The comment really had nothing to do with this bill, and was just another ill placed slap. I would hope most folks are above that.jerry_r60 wrote:Surely you can see that there was sarcasm in the cheeseburger comment. You seem to be reacting to it as a literal statement.ScooterSissy wrote:He just spoke, doing his job. Not out for cheeseburgers.K5GU wrote:What comments would you be referring to? I like cheeseburgers too. But I don't act like a child on the Texas House floor.ScooterSissy wrote:Some of you folks really don't seem to like Strickland. The "cheeseburger" comment sounds much like the childishness comments that have been going around.K5GU wrote:I think a member on the floor has to move a "point of order" to enforce the time limit. If they aren't paying attention or have all gone out to join Stickland for a cheeseburger, they won't be able to declare the point of order.TexasJohnBoy wrote:There's no time limits being enforced either. They aren't going to get past amendment 1.
Why?
I don't much care for Strickland, but he wasn't out hunting cheeseburgers, and the comment wouldn't be allowed against a forum member, so why would it be made against him?
Is it open season here on those that are simply not liked?
Yeah, his district is special...just like everyone else's.ajwakeboarder wrote:Why does this guy thing he's so special? He keeps saying his district is special. Why?